What is "MY LOCAL MENUS" All About?? >> CLICK HERE

Jump to content
GoDuBois.com
Sign in to follow this  
mr.d

New Legislation Could Remove Over 80 Jefferson County Sex Offenders From Megan's Law List

Recommended Posts

New Legislation Could Remove Over 80 Jefferson County Sex Offenders from Megan’s Law List

meganslaw-1024x768.pngJEFFERSON CO., Pa. (EYT) — Dozens of sex offenders in our area and thousands more across the state may no longer be required to register with state authorities thanks to pending legislation in Pennsylvania.

Currently, there are more than 22,000 Pennsylvanians listed on the Megan’s Law website at pameganslaw.state.pa.us, including nearly 500 in Clarion, Venango, Forest and Jefferson counties.

But that number could be drastically less if current legislation is passed.

Everything began in July 2017 when the state Supreme Court found the current sex offender registration law unconstitutional.

The Court’s ruling was made in the case of Jose M. Muniz, who was convicted of molesting a 12-year-old girl in Cumberland County.

Muniz was convicted of indecent assault for improperly touching his girlfriend’s 12-year-old daughter, and whose registration requirement was upgraded under the new law from 10 years to life.

The court found applying the law retroactively was unconstitutional. Though the law’s purported goal is public safety, the court declared it was, in fact, a new punishment being applied to an offense after the fact.

Critics of sex offender reporting requirements say they are oppressive, very costly to enforce and do little to reduce repeat offenses.

“The evidence is conclusive. Large-scale, offense-based registries like the ones Pennsylvania has employed over the past two decades not only fail to reduce sexual violence but in fact do just the opposite,” said Aaron Marcus, an assistant defender with the Defender Association of Philadelphia, in the philly.com story.

Critics of registration said that those requirements include low-risk criminals who are unlikely to re-offend and that lifetime registration can prove a barrier to keeping housing and employment — factors linked to re-offending.

Even those in favor of registries are concerned that too many people are being put on the Megan’s Law list.

Republican Sen. Stewart Greenleaf, who was a sponsor of Megan’s Law, was quoted as saying “We’ve cast a very wide net and are spending resources in punishing people who do not pose a threat to society — and we’re diluting our ability to monitor the dangerous ones. “We need to ask ourselves who are we mad at and who we should be afraid of.”

But many believe maintaining registration is critical to public safety. Without legislative action, state police could lose track of thousands of sex offenders.

According to a February 5, 2018 article on philly.com, Pa. State Police acting Deputy Commissioner Maj. Scott Price said there are 17,544 people whom he expected to be relieved of registration requirements as a result of the Supreme Court decision.

However, if House Bill 1952 is enacted, Maj. Price said it would place about 9,000 to 12,000 of them back on the registry.

Monday, February 5, the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously advanced legislation already passed by the House to replace the invalidated law.

The Senate would need to pass the bill before Gov. Tom Wolf could sign it into law, which many believe he would.

Jennifer Storm, the state victim advocate, said that registration notifications are crucial to victims’ piece of mind: “The overwhelming majority of people on this registry should be on there. We owe it to the crime victims. We owe them some sense of safety.”

In Jefferson County, there are currently 104 on the Megan’s Law list.

About 83 of them, or 79 percent, could come off the list without new legislation.

In Clarion County, there are 66 registered with 44 potentially coming off the list and in Venango County, there are 120 listed with 95 who could be delisted.

In Forest County, while most of the 206 total listed are jailed at the State Correctional Institution in Marienville, three of five who aren’t jailed could come off the list.

Since Megan’s Law was passed in 1995, state legislators have updated the measure to make it more restrictive – applying it to more offenses and requiring longer registration periods.

The most recent version, written to comply with the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), was passed Dec. 20, 2012.

It included five times as many offenses as were first listed in Megan’s Law, including nonsexual crimes such as interfering with the custody of a child.                                                                                             http://www.explorejeffersonpa.com/new-legislation-could-remove-over-80-jefferson-county-sex-offenders-from-megans-law-list/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, mr.d said:

Critics of registration said that those requirements include low-risk criminals who are unlikely to re-offend and that lifetime registration can prove a barrier to keeping housing and employment — factors linked to re-offending

Low risk is some risk in my book. If it was up to me I'd give them a barrier to re-offending with a sharp knife. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes it's simply a matter of alcohol and hormones with a dose of stupidity mixed in.

If a guy takes out a girl who is underage without knowing it and has sex with her,  then he just may end up on the sex offender list.  That is not a chronic offender nor a predator.

However, anyone who lusts after a pre-pubescent child can be thrown to the masses as far as I'm concerned, but in our society we're not animals stupid enough to think we can exact an eye for an eye and not be just as bad as the offender.  

Stupid can be fixed, evil can't.


"The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil but by those who watch them without doing anything"

Albert Einstein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Petee said:

However, anyone who lusts after a pre-pubescent child can be thrown to the masses as far as I'm concerned, but in our society we're not animals stupid enough to think we can exact an eye for an eye and not be just as bad as the offender.  

I wasn't talking about removing eyes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only ones that I possibly seeing being removed are the kids at 18 and had a girlfriend of 17 and the girl's parents had the guy arrested for statutory rape.

I know of one of those cases, not in DuBois, where they ended up married with a family and have been happily married for close to 20 years now. But his name is still on the list because of the parents filing charges and yes the parents are very regretful now. Sometimes things do need to be looked at as a case by case basis instead of using a very broad brush to paint everyone the same way. As to the perverts, I have NO compassion at all for them.


 

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler."

 

-- Jack Lambert --

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, steelnut said:

As to the perverts, I have NO compassion at all for them

Exactly. The article says removing low risk pervs so they have better choices of employment and housing so they are less likely to re-offend. That statement is ridiculous. I could go along with no risk and because they are not going to offend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×