weirdcritter
-
Posts
360 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Classifieds
Posts posted by weirdcritter
-
-
17 minutes ago, Deer Runner said:
Do marxists/communists exploit conflict between classes and groups, or are they supportive of the trans ideology because they are compassionate?
Which marxists/communists are you talking about? And how are they exploiting the transgendered issue?
There may be a few of them around, but there are also right-wingers who support transgendered people. Most of those who speak out about the rights of transgendered people probably don't give two bits about politics. There are also Christians who support the rights of transgender people.
https://www.hrc.org/resources/what-does-the-bible-say-about-transgender-people
There has always been conflict between classes and groups, and some exploitation, not just by communists. And there always will be.
I think the best thing to do is just let transgendered people make their own decisions about their own bodies, and mind your own beeswax because it doesn't really affect you. Thus, no chance for exploitation.
-
5 hours ago, Deer Runner said:
We just want the self-destruction ideologies that are right out of a communist play book to end. So we use the limited platform we have to speak on what is self-evident.
If your talking about NeoMarxism then I consider that nonsense. Communism is dead. Stick a fork in it, it's over. Technological change isn't communism.
-
9 hours ago, fedup said:
"My attitude"??????
How about your "attitude"???
I am doing my small part in trying to save our society. You are spreading liberal propaganda that is ripping our society to shreds. If you succeed there will be no tomorrow in this country to look forward to.
Yeah like posting on a small town message board and refusing to vote. If you do more than that I would like to her it, honestly. Giving my own opinion on things is hardly spreading propaganda, especially since I am spreading it on a small town message board where about 99% of the posters who care about politics disagree with me.
This country has survived a Civil War, a Great Depression, and other traumas. This division between urban and rural (which is basically what we are talking about) is small potatoes.
-
8 hours ago, fedup said:
That's the problem, you and so many others fail to see what is behind these things. It's called control. If you can control the acceptance of slicing and dicing little kids you can control society as a whole. If you can control the acceptance of illegal invaders you can control the voting system for years to come. If you can control the acceptance of energy production being shut down in your own country you can control the price people pay for something they need to survive. If you can control the acceptance of a president pushing his way of life onto citizens by using a pen, not the voted for government, you have a dictatorship. You know, that thing you said would happen if WE DIDN'T HAVE LIBERALISM.
are you getting it yet??? What is being accepted concerning this trans bullsh1t is just a nasty tip of the liberal control of your society.
You are allowing some of the most disgusting things a human can possibly do just to satisfy a micro- minority of sick in the head people.
When society lets the minority rule, society is doomed
How is allowing individual persons, even minor individual persons, get treatment for gender dysphoria that results in their eventually become the opposite sex? How does that work? For me that is an expression of individualism. I think society should be weak becomes busybodies who seem themselves as representing society tend to interfere with the rights of individuals, including their right to decide their own sex and gender. The law yes, society not so much, because if a law is shown to be counter-productive it can be changed. Again, allow boys who see themselves as girls to dress and act as little girls, and girls who see themselves as boy dress and act as boys; teenagers be allowed to get puberty blockers and hormone treatments under the supervision and authority of parents and guardians, and for adults, allow them to get the surgery if they wish. If you argue against these provision then you are the one who wants to take control of what other people can do or not do with their own bodies. You are the threat to the individualism that defines this country.
Too bad you don't have much faith in American ingenuity. There are many avenues toward energy sufficiency. In ten, twenty years we may have harnessed fusion power. I'm sure there are energy sources we have not even thought of yet. There is also safer technology for nuclear power. But according to you, the coal and gas industry controls the country now because they are the ones who set prices people pay. I don't see it. If Mobil or Exxon or BP sent me an email telling me what I would be doing that week, I would send it to my spam file and delete it.
I believe a handful of municipalities do allow illegal immigrants to vote in local elections. Since many of them likely hold conservative attitudes, many of them would likely vote conservative. I'm sure these laws will be rescinded once the electorate votes out those who advocated this. I don't see this as being a widespread issue. DuBois and Clearfield County don't allow illegal immigrants to vote, so what other places want to try out doesn't affect me. But at least those illegals VOTED, unlike someone on here who complains about politicians but who thinks they are too good to vote for a mere human who has the capacity to be dishonest, like 100% of all humans who ever lived. This person is waiting for perfect, innocent angel to flutter down to this realm to run for office. Not gonna happen.
If you are talking about a president signing executive orders, they affect the Executive branch of government. When they go too far, lawsuits quickly corrects the problem. If you think a president is becoming dictatorial, then join your fellow citizens and hope your votes outweigh the votes of those for this would-be dictator.
-
24 minutes ago, pennstater said:
Maybe this is the case is some areas but it certainly is not illegal everywhere. I was listening to ultra left NPR (sometimes I do for a laugh) and they had a “trans” man on who had her breasts cut off when still in high school. And the reporter was actually agreeing with her that republicans are the problem for being against it.
So yes….it does happen.All I can say is, I would not let my kid get that kind of operation until they were 18. They can wait a few years.
-
10 minutes ago, Gator11 said:
If you are over the age of 18 than do what you want but leave children alone and let them make up their own minds when they turn 18.
This movement of giving children hormone therapy when they are 4 or 5 is sick and disgusting.
These same people who are for this also support pedophiles and say that we should stop calling them pedophiles. Now they want you to use minor-attracted persons. This is also beyond insane.
They call women cis-women. I am sorry but cis does not need to be added to women or calling them birthing people etc.
There are two genders a man and a woman. All other names and variations are for the mentally challenged.
Now if you want to be gay, trans etc so be it that is your right but you do not have the right to change my vocabulary or insist I use pronouns.
I have a nephew who says he is non-binary whatever the heck that means. I call him by his given name if I ever see him again unless he legally changes it. It is not a dead name as the far left want to insist.
I also worked with a trans person(male who identified as female). Very nice person and I called him/her by the name they wanted. Which was a female name. No problem. She was a very hard worker and genuinely nice person but she did not preach or use pronouns etc and everyone accepted her as it should be. Now had she started preaching all this woke/left crap then it would have become one I am sure but that was not her goal or mindset. It is these Democrats in these far left cities that are the issue and they are ruining society for women, gays, etc.
Live and let live and quit trying to change the English language and trying to force people to bend to your lunacy.
There is no need to give 4 and 5 year-olds hormone treatments. Older teens, perhaps.
I believe in calling people what they want to be called just out of politeness.
The English language has always been in flux, continuing changing, which is what makes it wonderful. If someone wants to call someone by a pronoun different from what they wish to be called, no law against it.
-
1 hour ago, weirdcritter said:
Fedup, I think you and others on here want to live in a world like what we had back in the '70's, which is not going to happen because the world has changed too much. The Internet itself has made drastic changes in society and economics that are irreversible. That without going into changes in phone technology, automation, medicine, social attitudes among the young, etc. The 60's, 70's, 80's are gone, only to be revived in TV shows and movies.
No offense, but with your attitude you're probably lucky you probably won't be around to see what awaits in the 2050's, 2060's, 2070's. I'm sad that I won't.
Hell, honestly I'll be lucky to see the beginning of the 2030's.
-
You are aware that the Bank of England isn't a private entity like the Bank of America. It's more similar to the Federal Reserve, which many regard as a socialistic authority. Thus Soros made a good financial killing off a socialistic power.
Soros and capitalism: 1 Bank of England and socialism: 0
So what's your beef with him?
-
Fedup, I think you and others on here want to live in a world like what we had back in the '70's, which is not going to happen because the world has changed too much. The Internet itself has made drastic changes in society and economics that are irreversible. That without going into changes in phone technology, automation, medicine, social attitudes among the young, etc. The 60's, 70's, 80's are gone, only to be revived in TV shows and movies.
No offense, but with your attitude you're probably lucky you probably won't be around to see what awaits in the 2050's, 2060's, 2070's. I'm sad that I won't.
-
The only economic-political group that I can think of that would support young children getting gender reassignment surgery are extreme libertarians, to the right of the Libertarian Party. These extreme libertarians are rare, without a presence on the Internet, but they are very much for the right of children to make decisions on sexual matters and drugs as well.
Until fairly recently the Libertarian Party, which is very capitalistic, explicitly supported the right of children to have sex with adults.
From the Libertarian Party platform in 1981: Non-quotes from those critical of the party at that time
https://www.fortfreedom.org/b29.htm
"We regard the tragedies caused by unplanned, unwanted pregnancies to be aggravated, if not created, by government policies of censorship, restriction, regulation and prohibition. Therefore we call for the repeal of all laws which restrict anyone, including children, from engaging in voluntary exchanges of goods, services or information regarding human sexuality, reproduction, birth control, or related medical or biological technologies." The 1986 platform preserved the above-cited language, but greatly expanded the "Children's Rights" article to include the following: "We oppose all legally created or sanctioned discrimination against (or in favor of) children, just as we oppose government discrimination directed at any other artificially defined sub- category of human beings." "We also support the repeal of all laws establishing any category of crimes applicable to children for which adults would not be similarly vulnerable, such as curfew, smoking and alcoholic beverage laws, and other status offenses. (...) We seek the repeal of all 'children's codes' of statutes which abridge due process protections for young people." "Children should always have the right to establish their maturity by assuming administration and protection of their own rights, ending dependency upon their parents or other guardians and assuming all the responsibilities of adulthood." These quotes make it clear to any thinking person that the Libertarian Party deems the recruiting of, say, six-year-old boys and girls into a life of prostitution, heterosexual or otherwise, an exercise of something the platform never defines - yet nevertheless refers to as "individual rights." Indeed, should the parents of children so used dare to question a procurer's "right" to engage their children in such a manner, let them read carefully before venturing to lift a finger to interfere. The Libertarian Platform (both versions) also reads: "We condemn the attempts by parents or any others -- via kidnappings, conservatorships, or instruction under confinement - - to force children to conform to their parent's or any others' religious views." The child-molester's "right" to entice children into "voluntary" sexual performances is defended at every turn in the platform. If the child is baited with candy rather than raped by outright physical force, the Libertarian pederast can declare the event a "consensual sexual relation," or a "voluntary exchange of goods and services regarding human sexuality," or even cite the child's "assumption" of the "administration and protection of its own rights." After all, the platform plainly describes the distinction between a fully-formed, rational adult and a preadolescent child as an "artificially defined subcategory of human beings." As for the parents, any attempt to interfere, especially if based on religious convictions, is classed as "kidnapping," a practice banned by force of Libertarian law.The Libertarian Party of today has changed to accept that children ought not to be making these decisions. But these arguments still pop on social media sites and comment sites once in a while. All in the name of freedom, economic, individual and otherwise.
-
The extreme form of socialism, communism, will always fail because like all mammals we are a species that have a strong territorial instinct. Communism will only work when a limited number of people in certain groups agree to it. Monasteries, communes etc, and the children of these communes will usually leave when they reach adulthood because they disagree with their parents on common ownership. I have no problems with either.
-
42 minutes ago, fedup said:
Well Buddy there really is only one thing to be understood and removed from society. There are supposed humans acting like some Stephen King witch doctors slicing and dicing little kids for money.
These people are practicing liberals and yet you keep telling us that this country can't survive without liberalism.
I think that real American citizens believes this country will completely fail because of the liberals and their socialism hidden behind the word liberalism.
Why don't they just call their selves socialists promoting socialism?
Easy answer, even their non-thinking brain knows that no society has endured socialism. Hell, the Pilgrims couldn't even make it work
Capitalism itself is an outgrowth of liberalism. You tend to confuse extreme leftists with liberals. Soros, who is very much a capitalist as shown by how he made a fortune on the Bank of England's oversight, supports the mixed economy I discuss below. Regardless of anti-Semitic accusations that he has evil plans to run the world.
f you interpret socialism as any government interference in the economy, then the U.S. Constitution promotes socialism because it give the government the power to print and mint money, which in itself give it a major influence in the economy. Bitcoin and other non-government curency may eventually replace government issued currency, but that won't happen-if it does-until both of us are worm food. Also, the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. I don't think there has ever been any serious attempt to amend that part of the Constitution.
This country, like all industrialized countries I know of, has a mixed economy, a mixture of capitalism and socialism \, that works pretty well. Not perfectly, but we will never have a perfect society. Utopias are impossible, or rather utopias are utopias for the ruling class; they are dystopias for everybody else.
I fail to see what transsexuals have to do with socialism, which is an economic system. One of the most famous transwomen is Caitlyn Jenner who supports non-surgical treatment of transyouth but who is otherwise a staunch conservative Republican, often disagreeing with some of the transagenda. You do conflate extreme leftists with liberals. The two are very different.
-
46 minutes ago, fedup said:
I am sorry for all your difficult situations.
You just admitted that things that was done to you when you were young was harmful to you.
How in the hell can you keep making excuses for what is happening to these kids?
We don't need human 2.0. We need to let Mother Nature the **** alone.
She can wipe your AZZ of the face of this earth anytime she wants.
One of the few times we agree. Mother Nature could wipe us out. By using technology, scientific knowledge and machines we have to make it harder for her to do so. Physically, for our size, we are among the weakest creatures on the planet. One chimp could tear apart someone like Arnold Schwartzenegger in his prime. Yet we have become the most successful species on the planet. We became the dominant species via science and technology. Chimps, our closest animal relative, are endangered.
-
3 hours ago, fedup said:
Here is another sick in the head liberal that needs a operation to remove her mouth or brain or both.
Nebraska senator flips out debating ban on sex change surgeries for minors, screams 'we need trans people'
'Transgender people belong here, we need trans people, we love trans people,' state Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh shouted
A Friday morning session in the unicameral Nebraska legislature devolved into chaos after one Democratic lawmaker began shouting her support for transgender people amid a debate on a bill to ban sex change procedures for minors in the state.
The bill, which was ultimately approved by lawmakers and sent to Republican Gov. Jim Pillen's desk to become law, bans sex change procedures for minors, as well as abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy.
In voicing her disapproval to the measure Friday morning, state Democrat Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh slapped the lectern and repeatedly shouted: "Transgender people belong here, we need trans people, we love trans people."
I was under the impression that this legislation was in opposition to any gender affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, both of which I support provided its under doctor care and parental assent.
-
3 hours ago, fedup said:
Just about everything can affect a fetus. All that is happening now, is that the Liberals are making up new names and descriptions for those who can't handle life like most people.
Just think of all the things you thought you wanted to be as you grew up. Fireman, cop, cowboy, sports star, race car drivers, on and on and on.. Did any of them come true???? Most likely not. So should you have had a operation to become one of them because that is what you wanted at the time???
Face it people, growing up is not easy most times. there is a lot of stress involved. The strong survive and become functioning adults the weak don't die they just try to be something they are not and they expect everyone to help them be weak.
Don't blame the weak, blame the Liberals for not only allowing it to happen but promoting as well.
I wanted to be a scientist but had to give up that dream because of difficulties I had in math. If I could have had an implant put in my brain to help me do well in math, such as Elon Musk's neural link technology, if it were perfected, I would have gone for it. Still hate this area for not doing doing more to help me succeed in math. Various mental issues, which lead to a stay at Warren and years on powerful psychiatric drugs that I didn't need forced me give up my backup dream of becoming scholar. When I graduated from college I was hoping to begin a minimum wage job as a cubicle worker, convinced that would eventually lead to a good paying job in middle management, preferably in a city. My inability to drive due to panic attacks make me very open to self-driving technology. I would have been willing to work as a retail clerk as well. None of that happened. Today I work as an associate for Goodwill Industries.
If you want to blame anyone for the emergence of transexuals as a political issue blame scientific research and biotechnology. I see this as among the first steps toward adoption of transhuman technology, melding the digital with the human, our next step in our own evolution. Humans 2.0.
-
2 hours ago, fedup said:
Critter, can we stop with the brainwashed propaganda and deal with the truth for once???
The ultimate step in gender-affirming medical treatment is surgery, which is uncommon in patients under age 18. Some children’s hospitals and gender clinics don’t offer surgery to minors, requiring that they be adults before deciding on procedures that are irreversible and carry a heightened risk of complications.
The Komodo analysis of insurance claims found 56 genital surgeries among patients ages 13 to 17 with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2019 to 2021. Among teens, “top surgery” to remove breasts is more common. In the three years ending in 2021, at least 776 mastectomies were performed in the United States on patients ages 13 to 17 with a gender dysphoria diagnosis, according to Komodo’s data analysis of insurance claims. This tally does not include procedures that were paid for out of pocket.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-data/
There are a small number of operations undertaken under age 18. I oppose operations on anyone that young. Difference of opinion not brainwashing.
Are you familiar with South African runner Caster Semenya? She was born female but was revealed to have internal testes instead of a womb after she won many races. I myself think trans women should not compete athletically with biological born women until treatment causes their testesterone levels to fall to that of a biological born woman.
-
8 hours ago, fedup said:
It's the "IN" thing to do. You can whine and cry about anything in the world and the Liberal government and DOJ will come to your rescue to keep your little buttercup self safe from the evil white man. Stupid laws will be forced onto the masses by your micro-minority group.
So you plan on cutting off your Johnson so you can be a sexy weak woman because you are too weak to be a man. Read this and learn the real facts that proves you can't achieve what you want by using a knife.
Meet the American who unlocked the science of gender, Nettie Stevens, female research pioneer
Stevens proved that male and female identity were determined by chromosomes — solving a mystery that confounded science for millennia
Dr. Nettie Stevens broke down barriers for women and opened up doors of knowledge for all humankind.
She decoded the science between the two genders.
A pioneering cytogeneticist and researcher at Bryn Mawr College, outside Philadelphia, Stevens discovered in 1905 that sex is determined by hereditary traits passed through chromosomes.
Females are born with a pair of XX chromosomes, inheriting an X from both the mother and father. Males are born with XY chromosomes; the X is from the mother, the Y from the father.
MEET THE AMERICAN WHO CREATED THE KENTUCKY DERBY, MERIWETHER LEWIS CLARK JR., BORN OF PIONEERS
Stevens further discovered that the determinant X or Y chromosome was passed through the father.
Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One pair, known as the sex chromosomes, determines male or female gender.
It’s settled science today. But her work revolutionized the burgeoning field of genetics at the turn of the 20th century.
"She was a real prodigy," Gregory Davis, an associate professor of biology at Bryn Mawr today, told Fox News Digital.
Here's a lengthy paper on how hormones in utero can affect the brain of a male fetus, feminizing it. Same process probably happens with the brains of female fetuses that identify themselves as trans male after birth.
-
51 minutes ago, jaman said:
When a parent decides to cut off the weeny of the kid to be transgender,what is that kid going to think when he is a teenager. They lost their weeny and they cant have kids either "way" naturally, where does that leave them? Mentally destroyed.
Again, sexual reassignment surgery does not occur until a person is 18. One reported case where that happened when the child alledgedly was 15 may rightfully get the people who engineered it in deep legal trouble once it is adjudicated. I have never heard of this being done to a preteen except as an act of abuse
-
3 hours ago, Zilch1 said:
1.9% of the US population calls themselves Trans. So why are they so important that their platform is being pushed to the max. WHO CARES.
That's what I would like to know
-
34 minutes ago, weirdcritter said:
For proof just learned the most popular host on Fox News, Tucker Carlson, one of your go-to guys, has left the network. Unless this is some elaborate hoax, his last show was last Friday night. The announcement said the parting was amicable. We'll see. If Tucker's position wasn't secure at Fox News, then no-one's is.
You'll be thrilled to know that Don Lemon is out at CNN. With him it was saying female politician Nikki Haley was past her prime, and that a woman was in her prime in her 20's, 30's, 40's, and other sexist behavior. Don't know if he had to take sensitivity training. Something young people today, especially young men, have to learn is beware of those cupcakes.
-
If men, so called or not, want to dress up like little girls or even adult babies, it doesn't affect my life in the least. I draw the line at bottle-feeding and changing their diaper.
Should have said I draw the line at me bottle-feeding them and changing their diaper, though I don't even know anyone who does this. Someone else can roleplay mom or dad for them. But otherwise it's a big nothingburger what consenting adults do within their own walls.
-
12 hours ago, weirdcritter said:
Well, if your boss heard that you had said something offensive, through gossip or rumor, he does have the right to fire you in most states. Maybe all of them. Your boss may be a cupcake but he can deprive you of an income real quick. You didn't answer my question either, if given the choice of being fired or get sensitivity training, which would you do?
For proof just learned the most popular host on Fox News, Tucker Carlson, one of your go-to guys, has left the network. Unless this is some elaborate hoax, his last show was last Friday night. The announcement said the parting was amicable. We'll see. If Tucker's position wasn't secure at Fox News, then no-one's is.
-
On 4/18/2023 at 9:49 AM, fedup said:
Hey, while I'm thinking about it, if you worked for somebody who learned you had said something someone found offensive, would you quit before you got fired or would you get that sensitivity training to keep your job?
While I am thinking about this question there are many answers to it. First and foremost, just who in the hell found what I said offensive???? Am I supposed to worry about every cupcake in this world and just who are they to dictate to me what I can say or not say?
You just explained why I felt the need to make a list of what I believe you do, in my last post. Your more worried about someONE than all of us. I happen to believe that ALL of US actually counts for something in this free country and we need to quit listening to every freakin' someONE everyday.
Well, if your boss heard that you had said something offensive, through gossip or rumor, he does have the right to fire you in most states. Maybe all of them. Your boss may be a cupcake but he can deprive you of an income real quick. You didn't answer my question either, if given the choice of being fired or get sensitivity training, which would you do?
-
On 4/18/2023 at 8:25 AM, fedup said:
I don't recall calling him my "hero".
This whole deal was nothing but a big nothing burger until the crying liberals started to b1tch about something that was none of their concern. The business belongs to the owner. He can call his food or drinks anything he wants to a point. As you said, what is wrong with the word negro???? The Liberals can't keep their uneducated noses out of any non-liberals business. I hope he does not serve "black" coffee. Another thousand brain dead liberals would faint at such a thing. These people will just b1tch to hear theirselves b1tch because they think they have something important to say. THEY DON'T. But here comes the so called news giving the fools a stage to be stupid on and the stupid listens to them.
Now think real hard, why don't you hear any liberal b1tching about the blacks who throw the N word around like it is nothing (which it is)? It is taking all I have to make my fingers be still. I have every right in this country to actually use every form of the N word the blacks use every minute of every day while discussing this topic.
Don't you get tired of the mouthy small minority running your life? Why should the majority be expected to cowtail to the small minority so we don't hurt their feelings while they live like hypocrites???
You live your whole life catering to the small minority that serves you no usefull purpose and costs you money daily.
Fauci
Braindead and the brain deads.
Ozone AL
Anyone who cries climate change.
So called men who dress up like little girls
Doctors who cut up little kids and force feed them harmful meds
anybody who thinks they need to be a boy instead of a girl or thinks they need to be a girl instead of a boy.
Black lives matter
Any person who cries "defund the police"
The first liberal or non white person who wakes up crying about something.
Now that is a short list that I see you paying attention to just about everyday. What is it getting you???? Do you think you appear to be compassionate because of this?
There is a lot to unpack here.
This whole deal was nothing but a big nothing burger
It still is a big nothingburger . It barely made the news anywhere outside Gettysburg. Even right-wing media thinks Hoffman went too far and therefore has no interest in covering the story any further. I would not have heard this story had you not posted it here.
The business belongs to the owner. He can call his food or drinks anything he wants to a point.
He certainly can. But if people do not want to eat at his establishment because of what he calls his food and drinks, they won't. Similarly if people do not want to work for him because they don't want to be associated with the aforesaid food and drink, he cannot force them to work for him.
As you said, what is wrong with the word negro????
I knew what was wrong with that word. I posted a lengthy article to explain it to other people.
I hope he does not serve "black" coffee.
I remember an interview on TV with a couple of ladies who were trying to convince dictionaries to stop using the term "black magic" to describe magic used for evil. That effort went nowhere. You are grasping.
Now think real hard, why don't you hear any liberal b1tching about the blacks who throw the N word around like it is nothing (which it is)?
Ever hear of this guy named Rev. Al Sharpton?
One of my nephews (I have a lot of them) once asked why it was OK for black people to call each other the "N" word but it wasn't OK for white people. From my brother-in-law he's Italian, so I told him that if he and another Italian kid called each other d-a-g-o it would just be them being friendly. If a non-Italian called him that it would be insulting. Same with black people. My ten year old nephew got it. I wonder why some adults don't.
Don't you get tired of the mouthy small minority running your life?
Neither at work or home or anywhere else do I feel oppressed by any minority of any sort.
Fauci
I lost several friends to Covid 19 before the vaccine. If my wearing a mask saved just one person from getting sick, or saved me-I am 72 and overweight-then it served a purpose. No big deal to me. Trump pushing the vaccine is one of his IMO few noteworthy things he did as president. I did get Covid following a concert. I had already received the vaccine, and it made me horribly sick. Weren't for the vaccine I would not be here typing this. Since the vaccine didn't actually prevent the disease I have no problem I don't understand why this country had dealings with that lab in Wuhan, and if Fauci did indeed help engineer this virus, well, I won't make judgements until the truth-not the rumors-come out.
Braindead and the brain deads.
Is that the name of your new rock group? Cool.
Seriously, if it comes down to Trump vs Biden again, and Biden wins by one vote, knowing you do not vote, that will be so f---ing rich. So hilarious.
Ozone AL
Anyone who cries climate change.
https://curtis.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1492
So called men who dress up like little girls
If men, so called or not, want to dress up like little girls or even adult babies, it doesn't affect my life in the least. I draw the line at bottle-feeding and changing their diaper.
Doctors who cut up little kids and force feed them harmful meds
I keep explaining that operations are not perfomed until the person is 18 and any drugs should be taken with the consent and observation of parents and doctors, but you insist in believing that an 18 year old man or woman is a little kid. Fine. You do you. To me a little kid is anybody under the age of 12 or 13. But you do you.
anybody who thinks they need to be a boy instead of a girl or thinks they need to be a girl instead of a boy.
Again that doesn't bother me one way or the other. I barely think about it. It is said that men who hate on gays are repressing their own gayness. Wonder if the same applies to people who hate on the trans community.
Black lives matter
For a while I considered getting myself a Black Lives Matter T-shirt to wear around town just to p-ss off the rednecks around here. But with my luck some redneck would likely shoot me so I decided not to.
Any person who cries "defund the police"
The first liberal or non white person who wakes up crying about something.
Same with any white or non-liberal person who wakes up crying about something. This is America. Freedom of speech.
Let's become a trans
in Message Place
Posted
So you do oppose the right of people to make their own decisions about their own bodies, and you think you are qualified to make decisions for everyone. You may want to keep in mind that kids growing up today may want to exist and thrive in a very different society than the one you prefer. You and I will likely be long gone by the time they are half our ages.
Of course you, of all the people on this planet, has designated himself to decide what every human being will think and believe long after you are dead. I wonder how you got to be so arrogant. Living on that mountain where you could look down on everybody?
Perhaps.
Being someone who believes that the individual should let an amorphous entity called "society" make the decisions for them, with you being the arbiter of what is acceptable in this society, makes you a (gasp) cultural socialist.
And thank you so much for contributing to this great country by not voting. I only hope you can convince others of your kind to join you in boycotting the voting polls. That will make it much easier as we-young people really-enter the new digital age that is upon us.