Jump to content
GoDuBois.com
  • LOW PRICES
  • LOW PRICES
  • LOW PRICES

RITTENHOUSE TRIAL


WMJ77
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Guest Other Side of the Coin said:

That's the least American and least Christian statement I've heard in a long, long time.  The police were in a stand-down mode and this kid steps in to protect property from looters and rioters.  He is assaulted with deadly force and intent and protects himself.  He deserves a medal.  Had I been there and not acted to support him I would feel extreme shame.  Suggest you read the Declaration of Independence.

I'm a Christian and American, in that order.  I believe in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and the right to defend oneself.  If someone comes on my property looking to do harm to me or loved ones bodily, I will use my rights.  But I won't go out looking for trouble.   This kid is a young man, not even 20.  He had no reason to put himself in the middle of trouble.  I don't feel he should have gone there.  There was enough trouble already. The rioters shouldn't have been there either.  As I said before, he should get a much lesser charge because I feel they attacked him and he had to defend himself. I'm actually on this kid's side to an extent.  But If we let him off scot free then we will have more of this kind of thing happening with our young people. It would throw open the door for loose cannons. It should not be a free for all when it comes to guns.  You have to be smart and use your head.  Only use force when absolutely necessary.  Don't go butting in where its none of your business.   You need to be wise.  That's my point, I guess.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2021 at 1:27 AM, mr.d said:

He said he went there to help and if so why take a gun.  Saw from several news sources and seen about him crying on the stand, after all that crying he never shed any tears. Should have stayed home and none of this would have happened.

It is America and you should be allowed to go anywhere in this country. Some places you need a weapon to protect yourself and obviously he needed it.

He showed considerable restraint if you asked me. I would have emptied my clip and put another one in and shot as many that were advancing on me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeff said:

Got to love the left demanding a guilty verdict no matter what the law calls for. Is it only me or does the Democrats and their supporters don't believe in laws only what THEY want?

They only believe in selective law.  If the law benefits them, they believe in it at that time.  If at any time it ceases to benefit them, they no longer believe in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dubois_15801 said:

Read my two posts above.  He had every right to be there.  And he was legally allowed to have the gun, the proof is in the legal text.  Links to the actual WI law library provided.

 

Correct.  He should get off on the charges legally speaking.  I think he will.

Let the riots begin and the democrats justify it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever notice how the left pays no attention to the laws of our country? Look at immigration, IF they would just enforce the laws we ALREADY have in place there would be no issue at the border. As for this hearing, if there is CLEAR evidence that the shooting was self-defense then that is how it should be ruled, not ruled with fear tactics and intimidation! IMO the left does not want to follow the laws because THEY WANT anarchy in this country and people need to wake the heck up and start seeing what the past few years has been about. Our government clearly does not care about the citizens they are elected to serve, only about who pays them the most behind the curtain. It is high time the WE ALL start to demand representation of US and not corporations or foreign countries... but WE need our concerns taken care of before the government starts worrying about other countries!

As for irony, our elected officials have us all concerned about COVID, but yet they are not required to get the shot? Plus there is a summit on pollution and instead of doing a virtual meeting (because COVID is so dangerous) they all fly into one city and meet in person (polluting the air). Everyone needs to wake the heck up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Gold Brick said:

The prosecution attorney is about as bright as our current president! He really dropped the ball on this! You can't put the blame on the jury.

Another Liberal put forth as the cream of the crop along with the defective Liberal so called protesters that got what they deserved.

 

The Liberal/Socialist have a never ending group of misfits to represent their worthless cause.

Raise your hand if you voted for these people to control your life.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jeff said:

Ever notice how the left pays no attention to the laws of our country? Look at immigration, IF they would just enforce the laws we ALREADY have in place there would be no issue at the border. As for this hearing, if there is CLEAR evidence that the shooting was self-defense then that is how it should be ruled, not ruled with fear tactics and intimidation! IMO the left does not want to follow the laws because THEY WANT anarchy in this country and people need to wake the heck up and start seeing what the past few years has been about. Our government clearly does not care about the citizens they are elected to serve, only about who pays them the most behind the curtain. It is high time the WE ALL start to demand representation of US and not corporations or foreign countries... but WE need our concerns taken care of before the government starts worrying about other countries!

As for irony, our elected officials have us all concerned about COVID, but yet they are not required to get the shot? Plus there is a summit on pollution and instead of doing a virtual meeting (because COVID is so dangerous) they all fly into one city and meet in person (polluting the air). Everyone needs to wake the heck up!

Good post that can be wrapped up with one word.

Liberals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawsuit list

  1. JOE BIDEN-Yes he's eligible because he said it before becoming President.

   2.   Joy Reid

    3.   CNN Of Course

    4.    MSNBC. No Brainer.

      5Washington Post, NYT, the usual paper suspects     

6. Jen Saki   you're responsible for your words

7. Etc.............................. Especially Joy Behar and ABC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, pennstater said:

Justice was done. He literally legally did nothing wrong. Anyone saying it’s injustice is an idiot.  Yeah I said it.  

It should have never went to trial.  Why did the Grand Jury allow it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, jaman said:

Lawsuit list

  1. JOE BIDEN-Yes he's eligible because he said it before becoming President.

   2.   Joy Reid

    3.   CNN Of Course

    4.    MSNBC. No Brainer.

      5Washington Post, NYT, the usual paper suspects     

6. Jen Saki   you're responsible for your words

7. Etc.............................. Especially Joy Behar and ABC

This kid and his lawyers against the arrogant, know it all Liberals. I hope he becomes insanely rich as he drives the mouthy arrogant Liberals back under the rock they crawled out from under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...