Democrats in Pennsylvania withdrew a resolution to honor March as national women’s month after a Rep

[Pappy]

 

Pennsylvania House Democrats had introduced a routine, symbolic resolution to recognize March as **Women's History Month** (or "National Women’s Month" in the state context). It was expected to pass quickly with little debate, as these honorary resolutions usually do.

 

Republican state Rep. **Aaron Bernstine** then offered an amendment that would have added a straightforward **physiological/biological definition of "woman"** to the resolution text. He stated on the floor: "This amendment is very straightforward and clear. It defines what a woman actually is — because we do know what that is."

 

In response:

- Democrats went silent.   

- House Speaker **Joanna McClinton** (D) quickly pulled the entire resolution from consideration rather than allow a vote on (or debate over) the amendment. 

- This triggered laughter and reactions from Republicans on the floor, with some later commenting that Democrats "were scared to define what a woman actually is."

 

The incident quickly went viral as a pointed example of ongoing debates over sex/gender definitions in legislation, sports, women's spaces, and cultural observances. Conservative outlets framed it as Democrats being unwilling to affirm basic biological reality in a bill meant to celebrate women. 

 

The Fox chyron at the bottom summarizes it exactly:

 

**"PA HOUSE DEMS PULL WOMEN'S MONTH BILL AFTER ASKED TO DEFINE 'WHAT A WOMAN ACTUALLY IS'"**

It's a real legislative moment from this week (as of March 2026), captured during floor proceedings in the ornate PA House chamber (note the large historical painting in the background). 

 

[Petee]

3 hours ago, Pappy said:

 

Pennsylvania House Democrats had introduced a routine, symbolic resolution to recognize March as **Women's History Month** (or "National Women’s Month" in the state context). It was expected to pass quickly with little debate, as these honorary resolutions usually do.

 

Republican state Rep. **Aaron Bernstine** then offered an amendment that would have added a straightforward **physiological/biological definition of "woman"** to the resolution text. He stated on the floor: "This amendment is very straightforward and clear. It defines what a woman actually is — because we do know what that is."

 

In response:

- Democrats went silent.   

- House Speaker **Joanna McClinton** (D) quickly pulled the entire resolution from consideration rather than allow a vote on (or debate over) the amendment. 

- This triggered laughter and reactions from Republicans on the floor, with some later commenting that Democrats "were scared to define what a woman actually is."

 

The incident quickly went viral as a pointed example of ongoing debates over sex/gender definitions in legislation, sports, women's spaces, and cultural observances. Conservative outlets framed it as Democrats being unwilling to affirm basic biological reality in a bill meant to celebrate women. 

 

The Fox chyron at the bottom summarizes it exactly:

 

**"PA HOUSE DEMS PULL WOMEN'S MONTH BILL AFTER ASKED TO DEFINE 'WHAT A WOMAN ACTUALLY IS'"**

It's a real legislative moment from this week (as of March 2026), captured during floor proceedings in the ornate PA House chamber (note the large historical painting in the background). 

 

How simple can it be, XX or XY confirmed by a cheek swab.

[Pappy]

On 3/29/2026 at 9:18 PM, Petee said:

How simple can it be, XX or XY confirmed by a cheek swab.

It is not that simple for Democrats I mean look the how unintelligent their base is. They keep voting these fools in. Anyone that mentally ill would not know the difference between a cat and a dog let alone a male and a female. 

I feel sorry for these mentally challenged human beings. Bring back asylums. 

[fedup]

3 hours ago, Pappy said:

It is not that simple for Democrats I mean look the how unintelligent their base is. They keep voting these fools in. Anyone that mentally ill would not know the difference between a cat and a dog let alone a male and a female. 

I feel sorry for these mentally challenged human beings. Bring back asylums. 

I don't feel sorry for them. I feel sorry for our country and those of us who has to endure their stupid.

[Pappy]

I have been wondering after President Trump's term is up in three years what will all those TDS people (Democrats) do. They will all go more mentally ill. They will not have Trump to bash anymore. haha Those poor clueless bastards. I think we will need to bring back asylums and lock all these deranged people up.

[fedup]

3 hours ago, Pappy said:

I have been wondering after President Trump's term is up in three years what will all those TDS people (Democrats) do. They will all go more mentally ill. They will not have Trump to bash anymore. haha Those poor clueless bastards. I think we will need to bring back asylums and lock all these deranged people up.

They might have to learn how to live their pathetic lives 

[Petee]

If the voters don't wise up, then it may all go to heck!  Hopefully in that time, the Republicans can either push Vance forward or find another Trump.  Maybe one of his sons?  Who knows?  I'm sure that Trump will work with whoever is elected but where do you find another brave and intelligent soul like his?