block

If you follow the trail of articles she definitely contradicts what she said previously.

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

The ownly one being quiet in this whole case is the $270,000 so far Pittsburgh Attorney.  He already got his years wages.

Or find a Pro Bono.  Any suggestions 😧

Well. When anyone gets in trouble and is indigent they have public defenders available.

If you follow the trail of articles she definitely contradicts what she said previously.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

$270,000 seems quite excessive. 
It is kind of a catch 22.  Since he has not been proven guilty, let's assume he was operating within his contracted and legal capacity.  He would expect the City to defend his actions as an employee. Of course, his tax evasion charges defense should be funded by him.  If he is found guilty, part of his sentencing should be to pay back the city.
I do find it concerning the AG and government can confiscate your assests before you are proven guilty.  Freeze, yes.  
The solicitor was wrong to state the city was paying legal bills because he had no money.  She made it sound as a personal thing.

When they put her on the stand.    Herm will know its over. She digging deeper and deeper.

That's the way they talk when backed into a corner. She learned from her Gypsy heritage. 

If you follow the trail of articles she definitely contradicts what she said previously.

Very good points. I had to read it twice to make sure i understood it but still not sure i'm understanding her thinking. Is she looking out for the best interests of the city (like she's supposed to] or is she in so deep with Squirm trying to get a casino into her hotel that she's scrambling now? She says she is not a criminal lawyer but rather a civil lawyer (and probably couldn't win a case anywhere other than Clearfield County} but she better have a criminal lawyer on retainer. Like i said after the council meeting when she made her infamous statement (you don't get to ask questions you get to make comments} she just needed time to come up with some fancy mumbo jumbo bullshit lawyer type of reply. 

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

According to her story it was 2 supeonas. How do you do that? Without SINGING? 99% of us would already be in Camp Hill or Muncy(women).

**** BREAKING
 
Major Source confirms for me this morning that indeed the City of DuBois has made at least one payment on behalf of our on-leave City Managers legal fees.
 
Vote was March 27th. The vote was 4-1 to approve the payment.
 
Currently our City Council approves receipts in an envelope but do not tell us what's in it or the amount of the bills. (That clearly needs to change.)
 
I'm baffled why they didn't want to answer Jennifer Jackson's question last night  
 
The source absolutely cares about our city and wants to do the right thing for the people of our city.
 
Jennifer still has a right to know filed with the city so we will wait for that info as well.
 
#answerthequestions

So current council plays the right to know card  when a tax payer wants to know where their tax money went.  Current council is as transparent as the water in the Mississippi river.

The city council and the solicitor want to give everyone the impression that they have no idea what's going on either.