Jump to content
GoDuBois.com

dsmyhubby

Members
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by dsmyhubby

  1. Summary Report on Alleged Pennsylvania Bigfoot Shooting Case 5-16-2013 Primary Investigators Stan Gordon
  2. Already debunked by the PA Bigfoot Society. They were looking into it by the next day...this is old news...lol
  3. I don't know how anyone can say it's a BF vocalzation unless they see a BF making the noise. Until then it's a vocalazation that is unidentified.
  4. I hear the trailor for this film is up on youtube if anyone wants to search for it. I'm not going to bother, because I've read what people have said about it that have viewed it. It's basically a film about people obsessed with BF and not a credible movie about the shooting of one, nor proof that one was shot..or that they have a body. All pretty red-necky-Blair-Witch-Project type deal..from what I hear. If anyone finds it any dof and maybe worth my time and bandwidth, please lmk.
  5. Actually I was told that it was only an attention getter type hoax for the unveiling of a big foot statue for in the park near by.
  6. Isn't this a blend of fact and fiction? Correct me if I'm wrong....?
  7. Meldrum is a HE...do you mean Ketchum? (a she?) I think both of them have siad they were never contacted by Dryer.
  8. A fun read.. http://www.hominology.narod.ru/iseman.htm I then addressed Peter Byrne, saying that I've been trying to crack the Iceman riddle in recent years, urging Krantz, Greenwell and others to do so while Hansen was alive, and continued, in part: "When I read The Sasquatch in Minnesota by your friend and follower Mike Quast I asked him to help. And he did by supplying information about Hansen which is not in the book. In his letter he shared with me his opinion and hypothesis regarding Jimmy Stewart. So the credit for it goes to him." Peter Byrne wrote back on August 30, 2003: "Your hypothesis [i had told him it was not mine. - D.B.] concerning an Iceman connection with Jimmy Stewart is very interesting and indeed is one that has surfaced previously, mainly because of my connection with him going back to Yeti and Himalayan days. So, let me talk with some family members and what they have to contribute to it and then I will get back to you." His email of September 4 added this: "In the matter of the Iceman these leads definitely need to be examined and followed up; as you say, anything is possible and actually there is a faint but persistent rumour in entertainment circles that Jimmy Stewart did have an association of some kind with some large and mysterious animal." The email of October 30 said the following: "As of now I do not have a lot to report. There are, as I said previously, grounds to believe that Jimmy Stewart was definitely connected/associated to/with a large animal of some kind; however there are conflicting reports on exactly what it was
  9. As I said yesterday I was in chat room with people that seemed to be knowledgable about dna (from the conversation I witnessed) and had all paid to see the study, and they all agreed that the science and data were rock solid. They all agree that they way it ended up released was hookie, but it was to the point of releasing it herself or just letting it go because many places wouldn't even read it let alone peer review it. People were screaming for her just to post it in FB or her own site or release it as "whte paper" (I take it that means just throw it out there with out a journal and peer review to back it up) because they had waited so long and just wanted to see the results and hear from the people involved who would then (now) have their NDAs lifted. And IF ketchum is a crackpot they should review her work that was done/for the 9-11 tragedy. I think this will be the start of other dna tests what will get better attention and more credit in the future.
  10. Here's an opinion that makes me go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...... I think a lot of the commentary is missing the larger point of what is going on here and I personally believe this should be picked up by larger news sources. However this turns out, it is a big deal. It is obvious to state that if this scientific paper is legitimate (and I am definitely not saying it is) then we have a discovery that will rock science to its core. If this paper turns out to be a hoax by failures to properly analyze DNA evidence then there is an enormous issue with the eleven scientists who put their name on this paper. These are forensic scientists who have had their findings in DNA used in criminal cases. These DNA labs (especially for the ones in Texas) have put people to death through their findings. If you can firmly state that these scientists published false data through pure incompetence what does that ask of our judicial system which considers DNA evidence the nonpareil? What other mistakes or sloppy science are they producing? If this paper turns out to be a deliberate hoax then the issue becomes an enormous credibility of character conundrum. If these forensic labs are willing to falsify evidence for the sake of profit then what else have they falsified? This would bring into question every verdict that has utilized evidence from these respective labs. I would just keep this in mind as this unfolds. If the mentality is simply
  11. Wow..BF sites all over thenet are crashing. I'm in a Bf chat room on one site atm and it's really intersting watching sciency people discuss this. These are ones who paid to read the dna study. they claim the science is sound and it's truely amazing. IF the science world will get on board, it will rock the boat on what is believed. They are claiming even if someone tries to use this report to debunk it all it will only prove it more because dna can't be faked, and hers is solid. wow
  12. Now that BF one has to be a fake! It's way to clear to really be BF!
  13. Well, if it got picked up by, say, national Geographic (oh don't we wish!!) we'd have to pay to buy the magazine, right?
  14. I'm hoping the science is good and can hold up to standards. I'm not paying for the article because i assume I woulnd't understand it anyway. (guess I should've paid attention in science class years ago..lol) I'll wait and catch the discussion on it in the weeks to come. I think a lot of the screaming and nay-saying will come from the ones who figured it would all be posted on-line for free. I don't think they ever throught they would have to pay to see her research, even though the cost to fo a five year dna study has to be..what? I can't even imagine. (couple hundred thousand?)
  15. http://www.denovojournal.com/#!special-issue/crrc there it is...her report...(in HER journal) ready to read. One slight catch...ya gotta pay to view it. Ah...never mind. lol
  16. Dr. Melba Ketchum 7 hours ago. There will be more information tomorrow on the Genome website we will be launching. it will discuss delays and peer review. from her FB page...so we'll see what her explainations are...hopefully.
  17. Here's another article...thought it would pull it all over in case this site crashes. haven't tried the bigfootform site to see if it's back up today. . http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/2/prweb10427105.htm Researchers Sequence Sasquatch Genome, Novel Hominins Extant in North America Next-Generation Whole Genome Sequencing Proves Extant Human Relative, Findings Published in Denovo Journal of Science . (PRWEB) February 13, 2013 A team of eleven scientists with expertise in genetics, forensics, pathology, biochemistry, and biophysics has sequenced three whole nuclear genomes from a novel, contemporary species of hominin in North America. The study,
  18. It'll be nice just to finally see the whole report and have people that undertand it pick it apart. Many rumors and guesses going around the web. Samples are from may sites from what I understand, including the supposed Sierra kills and Eriskson's project in KY. (they are claiming 34 sites for samples) Time will tell. Again..i stay calm and wait to see where it all leads. (or doesn't lead) Hope they have the high-def videos they claimed, and also the awesome pictures. I haven't heard or read anything about those coming out on Friday though, so we shall see.
  19. This is the weekend...if anyone is looking for something to do. I can't make it....***sob***
  20. Ha ha ha...the whole forum went down..I think they might have just got over-loaded!!
  21. The article is longer with more info, and it is on a message board, so I hope the link takes you to the right page of the almost 500 page thread..lol
  22. Looks like it is finally (after years and years of hype) going to be published on Friday, 2/15. (happy Valentine's Day Dodgeman..lol) Though it looks like she has self-published. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/7225-the-ketchum-report/page__st__13440 New Research Paper Published Friday Shows Homo Sapiens/Unknown Hominin Hybrid Species Extant in North America DALLAS, February 10th A team of scientists will publish their five-year long study of DNA samples from a novel hominin species, commonly known as
  23. And I read yesterday that the FB/FB group was going tio Vegas to view the alleged body last night...not a peep out of them yet today of they did.
  24. And Dyer paid off people in the Georgia hoax in '08 for their help in backing up his story. One was a cop who vouched for the body being real, (and if I remember right he lost his job afterwards) and the cop's brother, who claimed to be a dr who 'saw the body, but in the end wasn't a dr at all. I'm reading this is the third time Dyer has claimed to have a body..first two he finally admitted were haoxes, and went on to say he WOULD HOAX AGAIN just to make people look stupid and show how gullible the BF society really is. IMO he's been laying the groundwork for this hoax for years..working with Musky as his "nay-sayer" and pretending to not know him, and then using him as his proof. He's had multiple video hoaxes too, including this "tent peeker" video that he claims was right before he shot it. People cliam to have seen his second video of this "tent peeker" series where he admits it was a hoax and the head was a mask on a stick...he supposidly showed it on this second video. Of course, this video is now gone from youtube, and he is claiming the tent peeker vid is real. Again..I'd love to see it all be true...but..but...**sigh** probably not.
×
×
  • Create New...