Keyser Soze

Well. When anyone gets in trouble and is indigent they have public defenders available.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

If Herm had a contract as manager of Sandy Township, he would of been fired last April and no legal fees paid. Only a corrupt organization would pay his legal fees.

Very good points. I had to read it twice to make sure i understood it but still not sure i'm understanding her thinking. Is she looking out for the best interests of the city (like she's supposed to] or is she in so deep with Squirm trying to get a casino into her hotel that she's scrambling now? She says she is not a criminal lawyer but rather a civil lawyer (and probably couldn't win a case anywhere other than Clearfield County} but she better have a criminal lawyer on retainer. Like i said after the council meeting when she made her infamous statement (you don't get to ask questions you get to make comments} she just needed time to come up with some fancy mumbo jumbo bullshit lawyer type of reply. 

Enlighten me please...Herman's Hermits the chaos continues...
  Have you read the article published today in the Courier Express from  the Solicitor?  She's defending the payment of Herms legal fees explaining the poor man didn't have a dime to his name, and his bank accounts were frozen. Yet? and that's a big yet, they weren't sure who the AG was targeting but chose to help the poor guy out?  That doesn't make sense does it?  Also they paid his legal fees "not knowing" charges were coming and extended his contract a week prior to the charges being filed?  Enlighten me also if he doesn't have a current bank account how is he cashing his pay check?  Have his bank accounts been freed up, or are they cashing a check and giving him the cash?  Are those invoices in the sealed envelopes approved without being looked at, at the council meetings?  I'm confused.

Thank you!  I called, it was a mistake on their part.  Thankyou for the information Keyser Soze

I just watched Jennifer's video she puts out everyday and am shocked and saddened by what she said.
She was accused of buying votes with her promotional giveaways which she has done in the past as well. i cannot believe how ignorant and asinine theses clowns are that you have running your community.
News flash to the morons who accused her of this not all those people who watch her videos live in DuBois but we do however frequent her business.
I like how she also called out the power hungry solicitor in the vid haha
 
On a side note I know that if I was running for something and got threatened etc. I would hunt you down and make you pay.
 

Trzyna was not a horrible city manager. He did a good job while he was there and moved on to something better. He is speaking up because he knows more about the job than most of us would since he once did it.

This is small potatoes compared to the money that allegedly is gone!

This is small potatoes compared to the money that allegedly is gone!

Oh, I agree and I am not the one who made it public. Who was that I wonder? We tried to deal with it discreetly and in a reasonable manner on our own with very poor results (it was capitulation or else) and then went to the owners of the property   I do reserve the right to defend against slander. We are not all that happy with the current regime in the city. They have done things that have made us very unhappy and we have a real whopper of a problem with them right now. Yes, we are using "cooperation" not "competition" tactics.  The day they say we can't work on the project(s) we are currently doing we will cheerfully desert them all and find something else to do. It can't be to hard to find something to do when we provide all of the labor free and also fund the projects. We are fools by any definition.

No mention of the $60,000 yearly garbage payments to the city  that the should of been placed into a city account for disbursement. 

Especially complaining  about having a property she owns reassessed. Many property owners have done that and you are stupid not to do it.   

I hear "the establishment" is mounting a smear campaign against at least one of the write-in candidates for "sins" committed over 30 years ago. 
The woman owned her mistake--which turns out to not be a mistake given the outcome.  And has been honest and forthright about other mistakes or missteps she has made.
The only perfect human died on the cross.  
Shame on those that would attempt to disparage her.  I would rather work with someone that can own their mistakes than attempt to cover them up.  
 

Especially complaining  about having a property she owns reassessed. Many property owners have done that and you are stupid not to do it.   

No mention of the $60,000 yearly garbage payments to the city  that the should of been placed into a city account for disbursement. 

No mention of the $60,000 yearly garbage payments to the city  that the should of been placed into a city account for disbursement.