The population of the US is expected to fall from the current 327 million to 100 million by 2025

[Pompeii]

The population of the US is expected to fall from the current pop 327 million to 100 million by 2025 ...
 

by Niki Vogt

For those who have not yet heard of the “Deagel List”, an introduction should be made to the fact that the website http://Deagel.com (which also maintains the infamous list in question) is an information service provider that is fed by information from various secret services. This site obtains its information from official intelligence sources and announcements. On http://Deagel.com, this official information is evaluated, summarized and sometimes interpreted.

The Deagle partners who provide data to the site are (officially):

National Security Agency
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO – OTAN)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECDOSCE)
Russian Defense Procurement Agency
Stratfor (George Friedman)
The World Bank
United Nations (UN)
And according to their own statements also various “shadow sources”

On a subpage “ List of Countries Forecast 2025 ” – which no longer exists today – the site presented the anticipated key data for over 180 countries in 2017. The population, gross domestic product, military expenditure and purchasing power parity of each country were stated. There was quite a stir at the time because Deagel made a gloomy forecast for Germany: Germany should only have 31,331,360 inhabitants in 2025. Amazingly accurate down to the tens size. Germany is not alone in this.

With a population loss of 80 million to 31 million, we are talking about a loss of almost two thirds of people for Germany. According to this forecast, 48 million people from Germany would have moved away or died.

The USA then faces an even more brutal extermination: the population there is expected to collapse from 324 million to 54 million, i.e. to exactly one sixth, i.e. a little less than 17%.

In an update from July 18, 2017 on the special “Germany page” (also no longer available), these numbers were broken down in more detail and the forecasts below, under Forecast 2025. For example, that the German population density will fall from 226 inhabitants per square kilometer to 88 inhabitants per square kilometer (by 61%). The gross domestic product falls from 3.5 trillion to 799 billion, i.e. by 77%. The military budget drops by over 80%. This is a screenshot of the former page. 

In Deagel's opinion, not all countries will be hit so hard. But why are some countries virtually depopulated while others are thriving? And why does the population of the Netherlands - which has virtually the same lifestyle and almost the same infrastructure - remain stable, while Germany loses almost 2/3 of the population? Why is Finland almost unaffected? Otherwise, there is practically no other European country that is not suffering extreme population loss. Do they all die – or do they move away? A good twenty million could be immigrants who would no longer be doing so well here and where the fight for survival could probably become very unpleasant - especially in the cities. And then many Germans will quickly forget their do-gooder nature. Plus maybe 20 million emigrants who are turning their backs on Germany... the rest are the old people who have been left alone... that would be an explanation. But is there a general pattern? In a way, yes. Let’s look at Europe’s “shrinking countries”:

Great Britain: from 66 million to 15 million –  minus 77.3%
Ireland: from 5 million to 1.3 million –  minus 74%
Luxembourg: from 594 thousand to 199 thousand – minus 66.5%

Germany: from 81 million to 28 million – minus 65%
Spain: from 49 million to 28 million – minus 42.8%
Iceland: from 340 thousand to 196 thousand – minus 42.3%
France: from 67 million to 39 million – minus 41.8%
Switzerland: from 8.2 million to 5.3 million – minus 35.3%
Denmark: from 5.6 million to 3.8 million – minus 32.1%
Italy: from 62 million to 44 million - minus 29%
Austria: from 8.8 million to 6.2 million - minus 29.5%
Norway: from 5.3 million to 3.8 million - minus 28.3%
Sweden: from 10 million to 7.2 million – minus 28%
The Balkan countries, Finland and the Netherlands are hardly affected:
Serbia: from 7.1 million to 6 million – minus 15.5%
Slovenia: from 2 million to 1.7 million – minus 15%
Bulgaria: from 7.1 million to 6.1 million – minus 14.1%
Poland: from 38 million to 33 million – minus 13.1%
Croatia: from 4.3 million to 3.8 million – minus 11.6%
Czech Republic: from 11 million to 9.9 million – minus 10%
Macedonia: from 2.1 million to 1.9 million – minus 9.5%
Slovakia: from 5.4 million to 5.1 million – minus 5.5%
Hungary: from 9.9 million 9.4 million – minus 5%
Romania: from 22 million to 21 million – minus 4.5%

The forecasts for the USA show a decline of a whopping 69.4%. The population there is expected to fall from the current 327 million to 100 million by 2025. The numbers for the United States have improved compared to 2017. The forecasts from 2017 (can be found here in the web archive) saw a population decline of 54 million inhabitants and still corresponded to a decline of over 83%. Canada's population is expected to decline by 10 million by 2025, from 36 million to 26 million (minus 27.7%).

But according to Deagel, Australia is also subject to a severe depopulation, namely from 23 million to 15 million inhabitants, which corresponds to a decline of 34.8%.

The Asian countries, on the other hand, are only partially affected. South Korea is hit pretty hard: from around 52 million inhabitants to 37.

At the time, http://Deagel.com received quite a stir and tons of inquiries for these figures. A long explanatory text was then published on the site, which was intended to explain the partly very gloomy forecasts. Today there are no longer any forecasts on the population development of nations on Deagel.

Deagel wrote relatively verbosely about the sources of the figures on which the forecasts were based and also cited sources. The majority of the economic and demographic data from these forecasts is said to come from institutions such as the CIA, the IMF, the UN and the USG (United States Government). However, a small part of the data comes from “shadow sources”.

For example, with regard to the USA, data from the Chinese rating agency Dagong was used, which, instead of the official US statistics, certifies an actual output of 5-10 trillion for the physical economy of the USA worth 15 trillion dollars. Deagle says openly that the official US statistics are generally considered to be fake, processed or distorted.

Then we go into a possible scenario of pandemics. Only the relatively low numbers of Ebola in African countries would have prevented death rates of over 80% from occurring among the populations. However, if there had been a widespread outbreak, no medical or pharmaceutical help would have been possible and mass deaths would have occurred. The population figures of the African countries in the Deagel list apparently do not take this into account. No pandemics were taken into account in this population development calculation, writes Deagel. There was also no mention of the global corona pandemic, not even a hint.

What happens next, however, is extremely interesting and is hardly paid attention to. However, some suspect that a large part of the population loss could be due to vaccination injuries and deaths due to vaccination . However, it is not yet possible to prove to what extent this damage is noticeable. However, it could be true that the severe impairment of the immune system of those who have been vaccinated several times could increase the mortality rate for these unfortunate people under more difficult living conditions (poor nutrition, thinning and overloading of medical staff, dying in hospital, cold and the associated more infections). But these are all just speculations.

If what Deagel predicts for the Western world is actually based on reliable material from the institutions mentioned, then these frightening prophecies cannot simply be dismissed.

As far as the US population decline is concerned, Deagel argues that there is a lot of emigration. So far, many people have come from all over the world to seek their fortune in the prosperous USA. This will be reversed with the collapse of the Western financial system:

The collapse of the Western financial system will wipe out the standard of living of its population while ending ponzi schemes such as the stock exchange and the pension funds. The population will be hit so badly by a full array of bubbles and ponzi schemes that the migration engine will start to work in reverse accelerating itself due to ripple effects thus leading to the demise of the States. This unseen situation for the States will develop itself in a cascade pattern with unprecedented and devastating effects for the economy. [ … ]  migration to Europe — suffering a similar illness — won’t be relevant. Nevertheless the death toll will be horrible.

Translation:
“The collapse of the Western financial system will wipe out the living standards of its population by ending Ponzi schemes such as the stock market and pension funds. The population is hit so hard by the force of the bubbles and fraud systems that the migration engine goes into reverse gear and accelerates itself through spreading waves, thus bringing about the decline of the states. This unprecedented situation for states will develop into a cascade pattern with unprecedented and devastating effects on the economy. [ … ] Migration to Europe, which suffers from the same disease, would be irrelevant. Nonetheless, the death toll will be terrible.”

The aging of Western societies, the statement goes on to say, will also send population numbers plummeting. According to this scenario, all the pensioners who have to watch their pension payments disappear into thin air find themselves in a hopeless situation. They are destitute, but because of the collapse there are no more jobs that old people could do, the young are emigrating to wherever they still have a chance of survival, and the old are simply dying out of hunger and desperation. And since the elderly make up a large proportion of the western population, that, according to Deagel, leads to these numbers

According to Deagel, this crisis will hit the world in the near future and will last between 30 and 80 years, depending on technological breakthroughs or environmental factors. The aftermath of this disaster appeared as a frozen image, and population numbers would remain low for a very long time.

According to Deagel, the forecasts for the countries' population numbers reflect birth and death rates, but also migration movements. Many countries will experience population growth through immigration while their own native populations decline.

Then comes an assessment of global developments:

„Over the past two thousand years we have witnessed the Western civilization built around the Mediterranean Sea shifting to Northern Europe and then by the mid 20th century shifting to an Atlantic axis to finally get centered into the States in the past 30 years. The next move will see the civilization being centered in Asia with Russia and China on top. Historically a change in the economic paradigm has resulted in a death toll that is rarely highlighted by mainstream historians. ( … ) When the transition from rural areas to large cities happened in Europe many people unable to accept the new paradigm killed themselves. They killed themselves by a psychological factor. This is not mainstream but it is true. A new crisis joins old, well known patterns with new ones.“

Translation:
“Over the last thousand years we have watched Western civilization emerge around the Mediterranean, then move into northern Europe, then transform into an Atlantic axis in the middle of the 20th century, which then in the last 30 years ultimately centered on the United States. The next change will be that civilization will move to Asia, with China and Russia at the forefront. Historically, a shift in the economic paradigm has resulted in death rates that are rarely explored by mainstream historians. (…) When the transition from rural areas to large cities took place in Europe, many people, unable to cope with the new situation, committed suicide, they killed themselves through a psychological factor. It's not mainstream, but it's true. A new crisis combines old, well-known patterns with new ones.”

The rise of China and Russia together with India and the BRICS countries, which are currently gaining new members, is not that far-fetched. If the Russia-China-North Korea-Iran axis wins the current conflict, that would be a very realistic scenario. This also explains one aspect of the US's fierce determination to win the conflict at all costs.
The outlines of such a Russian-Asian economic area can already be seen today. Deagel had the following forecast:
South Korea: from 51 million to 37 million - minus 27.4%
(no forecast for North Korea)
Japan: from 126 million to 103 million - minus 18.2%
Pakistan: from 205 million to 219 million - plus 6, 8th%
Malaysia: from 31 million to 33 million – plus 6.4%
Thailand: from 68 million to 65 million - down 4.4%
Indonesia: from 261 million to 267 million - up 2.3%
Philippines: from 104 million to 117 million - up 12.5%
??Bangladesh: from 158 million to 178 million – Up 12.6%
South Korea is currently still heavily dependent on trade relations with the USA and the “West”, just like Japan. These two countries are also militarily aligned with the USA. The populations of India, Iran and China are expected to remain stable.
A rough pattern emerges in the Deagel assessments: the countries perform better the:
they are poorer and more resilient to crises (Africa, Central America, South America, Russia, India),
the more they are in warm climates (constant harvests, no heating needed),
the larger the proportion of the original inhabitants is (less division, less conflict),
the less dependent on technology they are (Africa, large parts of India),
the more self-sufficient they are in production for their own needs (Africa, Central and South America, Russia),
the more they can live from their local resources (Africa, Central America, South America, Russia, China).

Germany can no longer keep up here, as we can see in the energy sector. Old companies are already leaving. Although the USA has a rural population that is relatively self-sufficient, the majority lives in the big cities, where they are dependent on shopping and state/municipal supplies for everything. Germany is also too densely populated. Russia and China, which do very well in Deagel, do not need the West - but the West needs China (so as not to be left without technical achievements) and Russia (without Russian gas and coal, as we are currently experiencing, we are lost)... We are hanging For almost everything that concerns digitalization and high-tech, a large percentage depends on Chinese imports. Not just smartphones and electronic devices, but also clothing, shoes, toys, and sometimes even furniture and medication. If world trade collapses, things will become tight.

The New York Times wrote on May 22, 2021, in the pandemic vaccination year, completely independent of the Deagel list and without addressing the corona pandemic or the vaccines:

“Less baby crying. More abandoned houses. Towards the middle of this century, when deaths outnumber births, changes will occur that are difficult to fathom. (…)Across the world, countries are facing population stagnation and a decline in the birth rate, a dizzying reversal unprecedented in history that will result in first birthday celebrations becoming less common than funerals and empty houses becoming ordinary become an eyesore.(…) Maternity wards are already being closed in Italy. Ghost towns are emerging in northeast China. Universities in South Korea cannot find enough students, and in Germany hundreds of thousands of houses have been demolished and the land turned into parks. (…)Although populations continue to grow in some countries, especially in Africa, fertility rates are falling almost everywhere else. Demographers now predict that the world's population will experience its first sustained decline in the second half of the century, or possibly sooner. “

We don't know whether this will all happen and if so, why. But many of us start to put two and two together. Could it be due to the consequences of the vaccination plus the scarcity economy caused by the sanctions in the Ukraine war plus the de-industrialization of Europe, including high levels of unemployment and hunger? Plus all sorts of bans and harassment because of the climate? Or do they already have the deadlier successor to Covid in their kitty with the catastrophic contagion exercise?