Jump to content
GoDuBois.com

fedup

Members
  • Posts

    19,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    299

Everything posted by fedup

  1. People need to wake the hell up to the real deal. There is tons of money to be made by a certain few by pushing this lie. YOUR MONEY that should go to the betterment of you and yours. As far as I know, there is nothing in the Constitution that gives your voted for government the right to take your money by lying about the weather.
  2. No, they are being advised by government paid climate Fauci's. Most of them are being paid by your voted for government using your tax dollars. Nobody in their right mind would believe that a fart is going to change the climate. If that actually was true then we need to make all politicians quit exhaling.
  3. MIDWEST Weight, dawn-to-dusk demands pose challenges to electrifying farm vehicles Agricultural equipment manufacturers are developing electric and autonomous machines to replace today’s diesel tractors and combines, but problems must be solved before widespread adoption.  Kathiann M. KowalskiAugust 18, 2021  Manufacturers will need to get over several high hurdles before farmers will switch from diesel-power, especially for large ag equipment. Credit: TumblingRun / Creative Commons The seeds are sown for the electrification of farming vehicles, but as major manufacturers begin to develop electric prototypes, they face major logistical challenges to replacing diesel-burning machines in the field. “The critical piece of the pie for greater adoption of electric vehicles in farm settings is charging infrastructure, followed closely by durability and reliability issues,” said Scott Miller, associate dean for industry partnerships at Ohio University’s Russ College of Engineering and Technology. “Farmers will not abide things that they cannot fix quickly, cheaply and easily.” Modern agriculture depends on a fleet of heavy-duty vehicles and machinery, from pickup trucks and small utility vehicles to massive tractors and combines that can weigh from a few tons up to as much as 15 tons, plus attachments. All that weight, along with dawn-to-dusk workdays and multiple worksites, adds to the challenges of electrification. “Today the reason why most agricultural machinery is [run by] diesel is because of the high power-to-weight ratios when we look at energy storage in the form of diesel fuel,” said Scott Shearer, chair of the Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Ohio State University. Large equipment “can work all day without having to refill.” Although diesel power is dominant now, the market for electric vehicles in the construction, agriculture and mining industries could grow to $100 billion annually, according to analysts Peter Harrop and Michael Dent at IDTechEx, headquartered in England. It’s still unclear precisely what mix of incentives, regulations and market forces might drive the transition to electric farm equipment, but countries will need to address the sector in order to achieve emissions reductions on a large enough scale to avert worst-case climate change scenarios this century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s latest report, released on Aug. 9, underscores the need for immediate steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Agriculture accounted for about 5% of U.S. industrial energy consumption last year, according to the Energy Information Administration. Technological innovation could also spur demand for electric vehicles on the farm. Small electric tractors could be particularly helpful for family farms in developing regions that still use non-mechanized methods for agriculture, according to an August 2021 report in the Journal of Energy Storage. Larger companies that make farm vehicles generally sell to global markets. So developments in other regions will likely affect the range of product offerings worldwide. Additionally, farmers in Ohio and elsewhere could be drawn to the idea of replacing diesel with on-site renewable power, particularly those who have already leased part of their land for solar or wind energy in order to boost income. As the costs of renewable energy and battery storage come down, electric vehicles could eventually lower energy costs for farms. On the drawing board and in the field Mindful of the clean energy transition, multiple companies already have been working on electric-powered prototypes. John Deere’s concept model tractors would allow autonomous operation, which increases efficiency and precision. Cable power could even eliminate the need for onboard batteries, so that an electric version need not weigh more than its fossil-fueled counterpart. A John Deere spokesperson declined to be interviewed for this article. Japan-based Kubota also introduced concept models in January 2020. Like the Deere models, they would allow autonomous operation. And triangular track arrangements could minimize weight and adjust for height in the field. The company’s concept tractor also featured an onboard solar battery. California-based Solectrac already has been offering small 30- and 40-horsepower-equivalent tractors and farm utility vehicles. Other options for relatively small tractors come from Fendt, Rigitrac, Escorts and others. Meanwhile, almost all airborne drones are electric. Solar power could benefit a range of agricultural machinery beyond charging tractors, according to an April 2021 report in the Journal of Cleaner Production. “We’re beginning to see some agricultural sprayers that are actually operated with photovoltaics,” Shearer said. An autonomous weed-control robot from Swiss-based ecoRobotix aims to use 95% less herbicides, for example. Research also is focusing on small electric ground-based autonomous vehicles for sensing the plant environment. But field navigation could still be tricky, Shearer said. Challenges include working through plant rows, such as picket-fence formations used in cornfields, and dealing with plant canopies. Challenges ahead But it’s a big step to go from prototypes and limited applications to widespread adoption. “Farm equipment may only get used a few weeks a year,” and those periods of use often run “up to 15 hours a day for many days on end,” Ohio University’s Miller said. “It does a farm producer no good if the battery runs out in the middle of a 1,000-acre field.” If batteries provide only about 15% of the energy that a full tank of diesel does, “you’re still going to have to stop six or seven times a day,” to swap out batteries, Ohio State’s Shearer said. With spring planting time at a premium, the opportunity cost for those stops’ lost productive time could run into thousands of dollars. Adding bigger batteries isn’t the answer, either. The additional weight can compact soil more than existing equipment does. The result could be less room for young plants’ roots to grow, said Dale Arnold, director of energy, utility and local government policy for the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation. Compacted soil also can interfere with no-till methods that many farmers have been using, Arnold added. No-till farming leaves more organic material and nutrients in the soil. The practice also lets more water infiltrate the soil, resulting in less runoff and nutrient pollution. The key is trying “to find that balance” that lets machinery do work efficiently, without adding more steps or hurting farm yields, Arnold said. Also, many farmers’ fields aren’t contiguous. “There are times where a large piece of equipment — a large tractor or a combine or a large cultivator — might leave home base and might not return for several days or a couple of weeks, based on the complications and the activities there,” Arnold said. Arnold’s own family still farms the Brown Township property in central Ohio that belonged to his grandfather. The family also acquired farms in Harrison Township and Union Township, he said. Typically, farm equipment would work on one farm property. Then it would travel to the next property and the next, before returning to home base days or weeks later. The cycle would repeat for the next necessary tasks. “You’re always in that rotational schedule,” Arnold said. “Many farm families, that’s what they do.” So, even if large electric farm equipment could run for a full day on a battery charge, it wouldn’t necessarily return to home base at night. That situation would add to the costs and challenges of charging infrastructure. And more stations would be needed in any case, Arnold said, because lighter-weight pickups or other off-road utility vehicles also would need charging. “The one key issue is going to be breakthroughs in battery technology,” Shearer said. In his view, even an increase in battery power to half the energy delivered by the equivalent weight of diesel fuel could be “a game-changer.” In the meantime, registrations for Ford’s first all-electric pickup truck opened in May with the introduction of the F-150 Lightning. Lordstown Motors’ planned electric pickup truck also could be a big winner, Arnold said, if the company manages to overcome financial problems. On Aug. 11, the company announced plans to begin limited production in September. “We feel that’s going to be a very competitive market,” Arnold said, noting that almost every farmer has a pickup truck, as well as smaller utility vehicles. Wi-Fi connectivity is an additional challenge. Autonomous navigation and controls, on-board diagnostics, and other equipment devices will “depend on good high-speed communications with base stations or the internet,” Miller at Ohio University said. Manufacturers also will likely move toward more cloud-managed solutions and software-as-a-service business models, he added. “As we know, rural broadband is a huge limiting factor for rural communities,” Miller said, “so these sorts of models will take time to implement and may require creative partnerships with major tech companies to overcome these connectivity hurdles.” The Reimagine Appalachia coalition also has been calling for major upgrades to rural areas’ broadband and electric infrastructure as part of a plan for transitioning away from dependence on coal and natural gas. The group is pushing for funds to come from federal infrastructure grants. In the meantime, niche areas for smaller vehicles and equipment could expand more quickly. And manufacturers of larger equipment will refine and test prototypes to make sure they can perform as well in the field as they might on the drawing board. A specific time frame for widespread adoption of electric vehicles on farms remains undefined. Climate advocates generally want emission cuts to come sooner, rather than later. And if the world indeed shifts to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions within the next few decades, equipment manufacturers will want to continue to meet farmers’ needs. Ultimately, “farmers are interested in tools that will help them increase yields and productivity,” Miller said. “The upside, hopeful note is that these tools have the potential to transform the method and manner in which agricultural producers manage their lands and crops by increasing efficiency and using their limited resources as wisely as possible.” Questions or comments about this article? Contact us at editor@energynews.us. TAGGED:agricultureelectric vehiclesheavy-duty electric vehiclesICYMIOhiosyndication  KATHIANN M. KOWALSKI Kathi is the author of 25 books and more than 600 articles, and writes often on science and policy issues. In addition to her journalism career, Kathi is an alumna of Harvard Law School and has spent 15 years practicing law. She is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists and the National Association of Science Writers. Kathi covers the state of Ohio. More by Kathiann M. Kowalski https://energynews.us/2021/08/18/weight-dawn-to-dusk-demands-pose-challenges-to-electrifying-farm-vehicles/ There is no stopping the snowball of stupid as it rolls downhill
  4. These idiots are out of control. ECONOMY Published October 11, 2022 4:38am EDT New Zealand government proposes taxing cow burps, pee to tackle climate change New Zealand has approximately 10 million beef and dairy cattle and 26 million sheep Facebook Twitter Comments Print Email By Landon Mion FOXBusiness 'Fighting climate change’ a ‘stupid expression’: Greenpeace co-founder Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore discusses the ongoing politicization of climate change along with Patagonia founder Yvon Chouinard’s decision to give away ownership of his $3 billion company to combat climate change. New Zealand announced Tuesday a proposal to tax greenhouse gases farm animals produce, including burping and peeing, as part of its efforts to address climate change. According to the country's government, the proposed tax on farms would be the first in the world. It also said farmers should be able to regain the cost by upping the prices of climate-friendly products. The move drew the ire of New Zealand farmers, with Federated Farmers, the industry's main lobby group, saying the plan would "rip the guts out of small-town New Zealand" and result in trees replacing farms. Federated Farmers President Andrew Hoggard said farmers had been attempting to work with the government for more than two years on a plan to reduce emissions reduction without decreasing food production. CALIFORNIA'S DROUGHT WITHERS TOMATOES, PUSHING GROCERY PRICES HIGHER New Zealand announced Tuesday a proposal to tax greenhouse gases farm animals produce, including burping and peeing, as part of its efforts to address climate change. (iStock / iStock) "Our plan was to keep farmers farming," Hoggard said, adding that farmers would instead be selling their farms "so fast you won’t even hear the dogs barking on the back of the ute (pickup truck) as they drive off." Opposition lawmakers from the conservative ACT Party said the proposal would increase emissions around the world by moving farming to other countries less efficient at producing food. New Zealand’s farming industry is crucial to the country's economy, with dairy products being the nation’s largest export earner. The country has approximately 10 million beef and dairy cattle and 26 million sheep, compared to just five million people. About half of New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions come from farms. And the reasoning behind the proposal potentially helping with climate change is based on the idea that farm animals produce gasses that warm the planet, particularly methane from cattle burps and nitrous oxide from their urine. New Zealand's government has vowed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and make the country carbon-neutral by 2050. As part of that plan, the country said it will reduce methane emissions from farm animals by 10% by 2030 and by up to 47% by 2050. New Zealand’s farming industry is crucial to the country's economy, with dairy products being the nation’s largest export earner. (AP Images) FAN WHO CAUGHT AARON JUDGE HISTORIC HOMER MAY CATCH BIG TAX BILL Farmers would be required to begin paying for emissions in 2025 under the new proposed plan, with the pricing not yet finalized. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the money collected from the proposed tax would go toward the farming industry to fund new technology, research and incentive payments for farmers. "New Zealand's farmers are set to be the first in the world to reduce agricultural emissions, positioning our biggest export market for the competitive advantage that brings in a world increasingly discerning about the provenance of their food," Ardern said. Agriculture Minister Damien O'Connor said the proposal presents an exciting opportunity for the country and its farmers. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the money collected from the proposed tax would go toward the farming industry to fund new technology, research and incentive payments for farmers. (FOX / Fox News) CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS "Farmers are already experiencing the impact of climate change with more regular drought and flooding," O'Connor said. "Taking the lead on agricultural emissions is both good for the environment and our economy." The liberal Labour government's plan mirrors a similar failed proposal made by a previous Labour government in 2003 to tax farm animals for their methane emissions. At the time, farmers had slammed the idea, and political opposition criticized it as a "fart tax." Most of the methane emissions, however, come from burping, not farting. The New Zealand government eventually abandoned the proposal. The Associated Press contributed to this report. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/new-zealand-government-proposes-taxing-cow-burps-pee-tackle-climate-change Just how much do you think this green deal farce is costing you everyday????? " It also said farmers should be able to regain the cost by upping the prices of climate-friendly products." "New Zealand's government has vowed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and make the country carbon-neutral by 2050." The fools want people to pay more money for something that will never happen in 2050.
  5. Be still, my fingers, be still. LFG, knows what your not supposed to know. Nobody wants to know what happens to the things they no longer need in their lives. Hand it off to someone else and forget about it. LIFE IS GOOD. OOPS I forgot to make my fingers be still.
  6. Maybe they will stick in the same mountains that they are using to store nuke waste that nobody knows how to handle.
  7. YEPPER on the gold extraction. But wedding rings are a needed thing. Think about the BS involved in the making of solar panels.
  8. I hated working with the stuff. It's worse than baby power. The strip job I worked kept me covered in the stuff and who knows how much I sucked in.
  9. My experience with flyash. Small coal operator in your back yard had a old small reclaimed strip mine. They had buried trees and stumps in it. Polluted a small stream. Nothing drastic. Dep said dig out the wood and place flyash in its place. I done the work. 2nd experience was a large DEP run experiment. Also in your backyard. They used tons and tons of flyash. I did not work on that job. I was one of three residents that watched over the project at the request of the DEP.
  10. Maybe they shouldn't have been labelled waste to start with.
  11. I think they are finding use for it. It's not so much of a waste product anymore.
  12. It would cost to much to solidify all the sludge with flyash. But capping a cell with it would be worth the cost in the long run. The big problem---- flyash used to be a waste product. Now it has become a useful product.
  13. I have some history with the use of flyash sludge and lime. If mixed correctly it will form a impermeable cap. In fact the Pa Dep actually used this mix to get rid of harbor sludge from NY and NJ. They placed it in a coal strip job where I used to live.
  14. These workers have a life and families they have to support. They can only say and go so far if they want to keep their jobs. I don't want to hear all about how a union or government laws will protect their livelyhood. If you throw a wrench in the wheel of how things are you will lose your job.
  15. Let's cut to the chase. You feel the need to vote. If you don't vote, you think you are doing something wrong. The TPD has worked very hard to make you feel that way. Are you that willing to be controlled?
  16. Come on Steel, your smarter than that. Your vote is a, YES, I am comfy with you. You claim to do all this research before you vote. If you actually researched the truth you would never pull a lever for the TPD. My guess is you look for a reason not to vote for one then you vote for the other. Can't you see what your doing? You vote for evil believing your evil is better.
  17. You, along with 99 percent of the citizens in this country has no idea on what some of us do (or has done) in order to keep your life comfy. This deal got your attention. None of you knew about the 3 men who lost their lives working on a pipeline (keeping you warm and comfy) in Driftwood Pa. Nobody cared. I have old black and white pics of some of the accidents that killed guys my dad worked with. They also died supplying you all with your comfy. Haul your trash to the curb, turn up your thermostat, we are out there making you comfy.
  18. Butttttt you keep voting for the TPD expecting the change you desire. What you desire AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN if you keep voting for the very thing that goes against the life you want. If you remember the old threads about fracking fedup was there telling you all that the government you believed was not protecting you. It was, and still is, protecting it's self.
  19. Here is the GAME people. Your taxes are paying for OSHA. They are supposed to keep this from happening. It happened under their watch. At your expense. If your government agency would have come down hard, they would set a precedent that they would have to follow from now on. Pay attention Steel to my next words. The R side of the TPD controls big business. They will protect their voting base. They know who pays for their side of the joke that runs this country. Fact coming up----- hang on--- This deal has been turned over to the lawers (sorry legal), there will be a monetary judgement handed out in silence. No precedent to be seen by the public. No rules to be followed in the future. Bunches of money will be made before to next death. The voting public has no idea about these games. They vote for more government rules thinking they are solving possible problems
  20. For awhile you had a panel come up that asked me if I was sure I wanted to mark all as read. I liked that cause my fingers don't always hit where their aiming. I end up marking a whole forum as "read"
×
×
  • Create New...