fedup

How many "white" people do you know that is disrupting your life ? And, you, living in white bread America will have to say too many even if it is just one.

Can you just imagine if those that supports DEI would enforce their wants for the white players??? Share of NBA players 2010-2023, by ethnicity Published by Statista Research Department, Oct 9, 2023 The National Basketball Association has one of the highest percentages of African American players from the big four professional sports leagues in North America. In 2023, approximately 70.4 percent of NBA players were African American. Meanwhile, ethnically white players constituted a 17.5 percent share of all NBA players that year. After the WNBA and NBA, the National Football League had the largest share of African Americans in a professional sports league in North America. How do other roles in the NBA compare? When it comes to African American representation in the NBA, no other role in the NBA is as well represented by African Americans as players. Meanwhile, on the opposite end of the scale, less than five percent of team governors in the NBA were African American in 2023. During the 2022/23 season, the role with the second-highest share of African Americans was head coach, with a share of 50 percent. That season, the number of African American head coaches in the NBA exceeded the number of white head coaches for the first time. African Americans in the NFL In 2022, the greatest share of players by ethnicity in the NFL were African American, with more than half of all NFL players falling within this group. The representation of African Americans in American Football extended beyond the playing field, with 36.3 percent of NFL assistant coaches being African American in 2022 as well. However, positions such as vice presidents and head coaches were less representative of the African American population, as less than 10 percent of the individuals fulfilling these roles in 2022 were African American. How many "white" people do you know that is disrupting your life ?

Fauci, the leach, has always had the WHO (World Health Organization) backing up his egotistical claims. Key Facts The World Health Organization (WHO), founded in 1948, is a specialized agency of the United Nations with a broad mandate to act as a coordinating authority on international health issues, including helping countries mount responses to public health emergencies such as COVID-19. The U.S. government (U.S.) has long been actively engaged with WHO, providing financial and technical support as well as participating in its governance structure. The U.S. has historically been one of the largest funders of WHO, providing between $200 million and $600 million annually over the last decade. In 2020, the Trump administration suspended financial support and initiated a process to withdraw the U.S. from membership in the organization, but President Biden reversed that decision upon taking office in January 2021 and restored U.S. funding to WHO. The WHO faces many challenges going forward, including having a broad mandate but limited, inflexible funding, as well as a complex bureaucratic structure. The organization has instituted changes to address some of these issues, but many governments, including the U.S., are calling for further reforms to allow WHO to better respond to future epidemics and pandemics as well as other global health issues. "The U.S. has historically been one of the largest funders of WHO, providing between $200 million and $600 million annually over the last decade. In 2020," " In 2020, the Trump administration suspended financial support and initiated a process to withdraw the U.S. from membership in the organization, but President Biden reversed that decision upon taking office in January 2021 and restored U.S. funding to WHO." Now ask yourself a question------who is/was spending your tax dollars wisely? ARE YOU GOING TO CONTINING VOTING AS YOU HAVE BEEN, BEACAUSE YOUR TOLD TO BY THE LIBERAL NEWS SOURCES OR ARE YOU GOING TO USE YOUR OWN BRAIN TO SEE A WAY TO KEEP THIS COUNTRY GREAT?

For those who does not have the time to research and those that does not want to accept the facts. Lot's of facts concerning this leach but this is one of the biggest one. YOU did not ask for him or vote for him. He was appointed by your voted for and held his position though both parties. Pay attention to what you party vote gave you. FORBESBUSINESSPOLICY Dr. Anthony Fauci: The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire U.S. Federal Government Adam Andrzejewski Former Contributor Dr. Anthony Fauci made $417,608 in 2019, the latest year for which federal salaries are available. That made him not only the highest paid doctor in the federal government, but the highest paid out of all four million federal employees. In fact, Dr. Fauci even made more than the $400,000 salary of the President of the United States. All salary data was collected by OpenTheBooks.com via Freedom of Information Act requests. Only federal employees whose salaries were funded by taxpayers were included in the study. Therefore, Tennessee Valley Authority CEO Jeffrey Lyash— whose salary is paid by revenues of the corporation (owned by the federal government) — was not included. $2.5 million. That’s how much Dr. Fauci, Director of the National Institute for Health’s (NIH) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and current Chief Medical Advisor to the President, will make in salary from 2019 through 2024, if he stays in his post through the end of the current Administration, and doesn’t (or didn’t already) get a raise. In a ten-year period between 2010 and 2019, Fauci made $3.6 million in salary. Since 2014, Fauci’s pay increased from $335,000 to the current $417,608. In an August 13, 2020 Instagram interview with actor Matthew McConaughey, Dr. Fauci was asked (at point 16:49) if he had millions of dollars invested in the vaccines. Dr. Fauci laughed and answered, “Matthew, no, I got zero! I am a government worker. I have a government salary.” He didn’t mention his $417,608 salary was the largest in the entire federal government. Dr. Fauci became the early face of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, appearing daily, often in a live broadcast, to update the nation on the emerging COVID-19 disease. In March 2020, he convinced President Donald Trump on the 15-day lockdown policy to try and flatten the curve, and reportedly advocated on March 29, 2020, for extending the policy beyond its initial 15 days. Vice President Mike Pence, who chaired the Taskforce might have outranked Dr. Fauci in authority, but the VP’s $235,100 salary in 2019, was less than the well-paid NIH director with whom he shared the stage. Their Taskforce colleague Dr. Deborah Birx earned $305,972 in 2019, also less than Dr. Fauci’s salary. In comparison to Dr. Fauci: Speaker Nancy Pelosi will earn $223,500 this year. U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will make $270,700, and Members in the House of Representatives and Senators will make $174,000. Four-star military generals outrank, but still fall below Dr. Fauci at $268,000 a year. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist Dr. Stephen Lindstrom in charge of overseeing the CDC COVID-19 testing system, a system whose early roll-out failure set the U.S. testing system back several crucial weeks, made $108,747 in basic pay, an additional $23,533 in adjusted pay, and received an “award” of $750 in 2019. The 80-year-old Dr. Fauci holds a medical degree from Cornell University and began his 53-year career at NIH in 1968. He assumed his NIAID Director position in 1984 and has advised every president since President Ronald Reagan, though he serves directly under the NIH Director Francis Collins. Known as the nation’s top infectious disease expert, he qualifies for a full federal pension and social security under pre 1984 federal pension reform rules. The Executive Branch includes 2.1 million federal agency employees, 1.4 million members of the military, and 500,000 postal employees. Federal employee salaries are generally capped at level IV of the Executive Schedule, which was $172,500 in 2019. However, there are exceptions, as Dr. Fauci’s salary demonstrates. The exception exists to make federal salaries for doctors and scientists more competitive with the private-sector. In our data at OpenTheBooks.com, there are three doctors, all working for HHS, who out-earn the U.S. President with 2019 incomes ranging from $406,000 to $417,000. Critics and lifetime achievements On October 19, 2020, President Trump called Dr. Fauci “a disaster,” though his criticism appeared to be unrelated to the doctor’s salary. In 2008, President George W. Bush honored Dr. Anthony Fauci with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor. Dr. Fauci is the 32nd-most highly cited living researcher according to an analysis of Google Scholar citations. Polling has shown he’s the most trusted public figure in the U.S. for information on the pandemic and reliable information on Covid-19 vaccines. Well there it is people, you can continue to allow your voted for government to brainwash you with the help of the so-called liberal news or you can actually start using the brain that Mother nature gave you. I apologize for my inability to produce a PULITZER award in my name for you.

Make my fingers be still butttttt I just gotta brag about when I posted one truth after another about this POS of a human being. I endured a constant onslaught daily, from the Fauci loving Liberals as they promoted their complete brainwashed heads. No matter what I posted I was accused of being stupid. They just couldn't wait for the next rule he pushed that shut down this country and cost many good people their livelihood. Where are they now????? POOF, they are gone, just like they left later because they voted for Biden and couldn't defend their reasons why. I was comfy with my posts then just like I am comfy with my posts now, In closed-door congressional testimony, former chief White House medical adviser Anthony Fauci said that federal social distancing guidance during the pandemic was likely not based on any data, and conceded that the lab leak hypothesis of COVID-19's origins isn't a conspiracy theory. Fauci's comments came during the second of two seven-hour rounds of transcribed, but non-public, testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. The repeated federal recommendation that people keep six feet of distance between themselves and others "sort of just appeared," said Fauci—the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and former chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden—to lawmakers yesterday, according to a statement released today from the committee's Chairman, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R–Ohio). The feds' oft-repeated six-foot rule informed numerous state and local pandemic restrictions, including mask mandates and capacity limitations at businesses. Washington, D.C.'s mask mandate, for instance, required people to wear masks outside when one couldn't reliably keep six feet away from other people. Fauci also reportedly told lawmakers yesterday that the lab leak hypothesis was not a conspiracy theory. Early in the pandemic, Fauci and other National Institute of Health (NIH) officials pushed researchers to produce a paper downplaying the possibility COVID-19 had man-made origins. Last year, the House's Coronavirus subcommittee published emails and other communications showing Fauci's own efforts to downplay the lab leak early in the pandemic and pressure researchers to produce a paper to that effect. The resulting "Proximal Origins" paper published in March 2020 totally dismissed the lab leak, instead saying that COVID-19 had zoonotic origins. It heavily influenced initial media coverage of the lab leak as a debunked conspiracy. Other communications uncovered by the House subcommittee show the paper's authors candidly saying they were downplaying their assessment of a possible lab leak for political reasons. Across his two days of testimony, Fauci engaged in "semantics" about the definitions of lab leaks and gain-of-function research—which involves engineering viruses to make them more deadly—to "cover up" his suppression of the lab leak hypothesis and improperly defended his past statements that NIH didn't fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China, said Wenstrup. Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) has called for Fauci to be criminally prosecuted for lying to Congress about NIH's funding of gain-of-function research. "Dr. Fauci's transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system," said Wenstrup today. "It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America's response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data." Don't forget to put your mask on

Affirmative action??? DEI-----diversity, equity and inclusion What is the difference???? Affirmative action,----------easy to understand words------ people who are not qualified will be chosen over those that are qualified just because of the color of their skin or their gender. Affirmative action, in the United States, an active effort to improve employment or educational opportunities for members of minority groups and for women. Affirmative action began as a government remedy to the effects of long-standing discrimination against such groups and has consisted of policies, programs, and procedures that give limited preferences to minorities and women in job hiring, admission to institutions of higher education, the awarding of government contracts, and other social benefits. The typical criteria for affirmative action are race, disability, gender, ethnic origin, and age. Affirmative action was initiated by the administration of President Lyndon Johnson (1963–69) in order to improve opportunities for African Americans while civil rights legislation was dismantling the legal basis for discrimination. The federal government began to institute affirmative action policies under the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and an executive order in 1965. Businesses receiving federal funds were prohibited from using aptitude tests and other criteria that tended to discriminate against African Americans. Affirmative action programs were monitored by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Subsequently, affirmative action was broadened to cover women and Native Americans, Hispanics, and other minorities and was extended to colleges and universities and state and federal agencies. By the late 1970s the use of racial quotas and minority set-asides led to court challenges of affirmative action as a form of “reverse discrimination.” The first major challenge was Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that quotas may not be used to reserve places for minority applicants if white applicants are denied a chance to compete for those places. Although the court outlawed quota programs, it allowed colleges to use race as a factor in making admissions decisions. Two years later a fragmented court upheld a 1977 federal law requiring that 10 percent of funds for public works be allotted to qualified minority contractors. Opposition to affirmative action in California culminated in the passage in 1996 of the California Civil Rights Initiative (Proposition 209), which prohibited all government agencies and institutions from giving preferential treatment to individuals on the basis of their race or sex. The Supreme Court effectively upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 209 in November 1997 by refusing to hear a challenge to its enforcement. Legislation similar to Proposition 209 was subsequently proposed in other states and was passed in Washington in 1998 Affirmative action was initiated by the administration of President Lyndon Johnson Most likely the most racist president ever elected. So for 60 years hard working smart people were denied their chance at prosperity by their voted for government. And then came the new liberal way of screwing people because of the color of their skin or their gender (plus many other reasons now) It's called---------->DEI-----diversity, equity and inclusion Once again the Liberals has came up with different words for their same ole bullsh1t. What is DEI? “Diversity” refers to the representation of people from a variety of backgrounds – particularly referring to people of different races, genders, sexual orientations, disabilities, religions and more – at all levels in an organization, including the leadership level. “Equity” focuses on fairness and justice, particularly referring to compensation and whether people are being paid or treated fairly, DEI experts told ABC News. “Inclusion” is about whether people feel like they belong, and whether they feel heard or valued in an organization, experts say. Once again-----easy to understand words------ people who are not qualified will be chosen over those that are qualified just because of the color of their skin or their gender. The same bullsh1t as the liberal's last try at screwing people. But this time they added enough words to make it impossible for the Supreme Court to stop their attack. (just like their move to resell their lies by changing Manmade Globel Warming to climate change for the stupid who does not understand that their climate changes every second). What is it gonna take people???? How much longer are you willing to be used by one group of people controlling your lives? What is it gonna take to make you stand up against the bullsh1t? Your name on your headstone right after you have come to your senses? I could spend hours posting actual facts explaining why your voted for government should never pass laws or endorse any action that eliminates any persons right to succeed as a human being. Think------- Your voted for government came up with affirmative action a life time ago, for a lot of people, and it obviously did not work because it could not work. So why do you think their new plan will work???

Good posts Steve. It's all right there for the world to see. Specially when the crackhead turned and looked at the guy then laughed.

And the answer is----- non thinking brainwashed suckers. The usual crowd.

Another lady doing her job, Nancy Mace from SC. She called for Biden's arrests on the spot and told him he was to afraid to appear. The whole thing was pre-planned by the liberals. Sleezeball Biden is having Hollywood liberals make a documentary for him. You can bet today's shltshow happened just for this lying documentary. Wake up people. The Biden crime family is using you everyday. YA I know, it ain't happening in DuBois so who cares.

Today, the Liberal Clown Car was unloaded in YOUR HOUSE. What a sight. Three cheers to my beautiful wife Ms Greene for driving the scum from YOUR HOUSE. At least part of your voted for government did it's job today. Turn on any non-liberal news source today. This is just ONE of three major news events being covered today. #2. Your president and others lost track of man responsible for running your war machine for days #3. The Liberals in New York City threw school kids out of their school and replaced them with illegal invaders. The Liberals and their stupidity has come home to roost for all to see. BE PROUD, LIBERALS, BE PROUD

Thank you You are correct.

Stop demanding the truth and just accepting what you are told by others that IS presented as the truth without question.

Sorry Steve, I try not to jump on your thread but sometimes you kick the door open with the truth that I can't ignore.

Once the news ratings fade off and the crooked DOJ gets done protecting the scum, there will be no Lolita Express, no island, no young girls and not one old man involved. It all will match the dream sequence presented by the TV program called Dallas. This is such a freaking joke that good people ought to be puking. Planes do not leave the ground and land on another ground without many people being involved. Young girls looking for money don't just automatically disappear. GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, the good law enforcement people that you can see on your TV that are shown on the program called "The first 48" would have had these scumbags arrested within a month. The protecting DOJ corruption has to stop if you want your country to survive.

Can you just imagine living a life, that faceless candy is so important to you but claims by companies that promise instant weight loss ( for eating that candy) is of no concern to you?

Take your pick What group of people will ruin New Year's celebrations? Proud Boys? Old white guys? Trump supporters? Fox news employees? Pa hunt club owners? Boots on the ground law enforcement employees? People NOT on welfare? People NOT attending college? People trying to stop the Liberal supported invasion of our country? Most of the citizens of the Dubois area and the members of godubois? Or College kids? People for abortion? People against the death penalty? People demanding our country to be invaded? People against boots on the ground law enforcement? People who hate Trump? People who defends the followers of Jew hatred? People who hate Jews? Any Liberal group you can think of that claims Non-liberals are a threat to our Democracy? Mail in your vote, so you can be heard. Mail to the USPS, DNC, and any MSM news outlet

There is and it's already a legal part of law enforcement.

Wow. It will take me days to understand your factual points concerning the conversation. Or it will take me 5 seconds to understand that you have nothing but your feelings.

Well it appears as if the Liberals set a new monthly record in allowing illegal invaders to just walk into our country. Not only did they walk in, the liberals are using my money to transport them all over my country. Then basically setting them free never to be traced again. If you actually care, you can turn on your TV at anytime of the day or night and see it happen with your own eyes. But if you live in a small northern country town you will not see a bus (paid for with your tax dollars) unloading these invaders. Or a plane. You get to look out your window and say (What! Me worry? Why should I?) No sense in worrying about anything but yourself. The lack of the ability to use the ability to think amazes me. Those that you don't know that you allow into your backyard will, for generations, produce more of what you don't know for your kids to deal with. But why should you worry? You will be dead and gone from your happy life. Now I am a uneducated dummy but I have to ask a dumb question, does this high cost, high education bother to teach about ramifications of what they they teach? Or does the institutes just give Credence (by name) to those ignorant protestors? I AM FROM HARVARD, YOU HAVE TO LISTEN TO ME, BECAUSE I AM EDUCATED AND YOU ARE NOT.

Just one of many things I listed for people to think about. The following was not written by the dummy known as fedup 8 USC 1325: Improper entry by alienText contains those laws in effect on January 4, 1995 From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITYCHAPTER 11-NATIONALITYSUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATIONPart VIII-General Penalty Provisions Jump To:Source CreditAmendmentsEffective DateCross Reference §1325 . Improper entry by alien (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. (b) Marriage fraud Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both. (c) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both. (June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 8, §275, 66 Stat. 229 ; Nov. 10, 1986, Pub. L. 99–639, §2(d), 100 Stat. 3542 ; Nov. 29, 1990, Pub. L. 101–649, title I, §121(b)(3), title V, §543(b)(2), 104 Stat. 4994 , 5059; Dec. 12, 1991, Pub. L. 102–232, title III, §306(c)(3), 105 Stat. 1752 .) Amendments 1991-Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–232 substituted "fined under title 18" for "fined not more than $2,000 (or, if greater, the amount provided under title 18)". 1990-Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–649, §543(b)(2), inserted "or attempts to enter" after "(1) enters" and "attempts to enter or" after "or (3)", and substituted "shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined not more than $2,000 (or, if greater, the amount provided under title 18) or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years" for "shall, for the first commission of any such offenses, be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by a fine of not more than $500, or by both, and for a subsequent commission of any such offenses shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than two years, or by a fine of not more than $1,000". Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–649, §121(b)(3), added subsec. (c). 1986-Pub. L. 99–639 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b). Effective Date of 1991 Amendment Amendment by Pub. L. 102–232 effective as if included in the enactment of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–649, see section 310(1) of Pub. L. 102–232, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title. Effective Date of 1990 Amendment Amendment by section 121(b)(3) of Pub. L. 101–649 effective Oct. 1, 1991, and applicable beginning with fiscal year 1992, see section 161(a) of Pub. L. 101–649, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title. Amendment by section 543(b)(2) of Pub. L. 101–649 applicable to actions taken after Nov. 29, 1990, see section 543(c) of Pub. L. 101–649, set out as a note under section 1221 of this title. Cross References Definition of entry, immigration laws, immigration officer, and United States, see section 1101 of this title. Section Referred to in Other Sections This section is referred to in section 1329 of this title; title 10 section 374. Now does any of the smarter than me wordsmiths care to attempt their expertise on why these rules are not being followed by your vote for government. Can you use your expert wordsmithing to explain why harm can come to citizens of this country because the voted for government is not following the rules they accepted when the were elected? Actually can you talk to the common man/women and explain to them why they should not be worried about what their voted for government IS NOT doing by law? Can you use your (maybe paid for) college education to explain why we lessor people should believe that allowing illegal invaders into our country is a good thing? Can you put into, perfect words, why our tax dollars and national debt is being used to pay for other country's border protection? Can you use your great education to explain why your voted for government is willing to send men and women over seas to kill and die for trying to protect and promote the long forgotten beliefs of our once free country? Can you use your extreme intelligence and wordsmithing to make people just be comfy for what their tax dollars are supplying them? And the list goes on and on and on. Just as a factual side note to what I am trying to get across to those that think they are smarter than other people because they may have paid big bucks for a college degree, did you watch the government hearings as your college presidents tried to explain away their arrogant bigot selves? They couldn't speak any better than fedup types and yet they control the insane expenses that it cost people to attend their brainwashing institutes. But don't worry, in time these Liberal taught Liberals will gain enough political power to make you pay for the education loan they signed for. That's the Socialist's way of life as they hide behind the word called Liberal.

Let's go back to your first highly educated response. None of the questions are worth answering. "Should anyone dare to answer with anything positive, you would consider them to be stupid." Didn't you education teach you that you should never assume what you really don't know???? What positive answers concerning the general public would you like to submit to the conversation? You decided that your positive's were good enough without worrying about others.

I don't pretend to be some sort of liberal college educated wordsmith that has been taught to twist facts, with words, pretending the facts are not true. I do not presume. I see things for what they are, not what I want them to be. It's called, real life. And by the way, you just proved, the intent of my post. You found yourself thinking about what I said. And that, Sir, is what I set about doing even though my words did not live up to your superior literary demands.

So once again, I am completely lost at trying to understand the liberal mind. A extremely small group of liberals with legal powers, (were they voted for or appointed by other liberals) decided to remove a former president from the People's choice. Their reasoning is beyond comprehension. This did happen in the past so it can happen again. Liberal states left the union of the United States and caused the killing of many American citizens. They then removed Lincoln from the voting process. The man who led the masses into freeing the slaves. Now today, those very same type of people wants all Americans to hand all the black people free money because THEY enslaved black people so many years ago. But yet, they want Trump removed from the voting process because they removed Lincoln for freeing the slaves. Is there a real and true answer explaining the insanity?

You missed the reason for my post. I was not talking about myself or anyone else for that matter. This post, just like most of my posts was made to get people to think and question what they see and hear. What you do with the answers to your questions is up to you.

List the things, and explain why, your government has made your life better since you was born. List, and explain, the things you hear and see every day that is provided by any paid for information platforms that makes you feel better than the day before. List and explain all the lies your being told that you know is not true. List the reasons that you have to continue to vote for what you have been given. List the reasons why you have decided not to repeat what never achieved what you desired. List the reasons why your life sucks. List the reasons why you don't care to add your thoughts to any of the above questions. Are you willing to admit that you have given up the thought that you count for anything. Are you willing to admit that you are being controlled by others even though you are a better person than those controlling your life. THINK PEOPLE, THINK