Jump to content
GoDuBois.com

The GREEN MACHINE at work


fedup

Recommended Posts

OK you ignorant liberal who is costing us all money with your stupid.   Her is a grade school lesson that you must have missed in all the great education you received studying man made global warming.

How much carbon dioxide does an acre of Michigan corn absorb in a growing season? That is a question that is often asked, and the answer may surprise many people. Our calculations show that number to be in excess of 36,000 lbs. of carbon dioxide per acre!Jun 7, 2007

 

Carbon is in carbon dioxide, which is a greenhouse gas that traps heat close to Earth. It helps Earth hold some of the heat it receives from the Sun so it doesn't all escape back into space. But CO2 is only good up to a point – beyond that point, Earth's temperature warms up too much. NASA research satellites such as OCO-2 and OCO-3 are studying how carbon moves around the planet.

All living things on Earth contain carbon. Even you contain carbon. Lots of it! Like every other living thing on this planet, we are a part of Earth's carbon cycle. Plants take in CO2. They keep the carbon and give away the oxygen. Animals breathe in the oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide. Carbon, including carbon dioxide, has cycled into and out of the air for a long time. This cycling of carbon has stayed balanced over long periods of time.

 

What is carbon dioxide?

Carbon dioxide is an important gas for life on the planet. (Remember our deep breath in and out?) It is crucial to maintaining the protective blanket that is Earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is often called "C-O-2" (pronounced see-oh-two) and written as "CO2" because "C" stands for carbon and "O" stands for oxygen. Carbon dioxide is one of the primary greenhouse gases on Earth.

 

Now don't forget people, this lying liberal will tell you that it is ok to pollute as long as you buy Carbon Points from him and his other rich friends.

This whole thing is a damn Liberal hoax designed to remove money from your hands and place that money in a certain few hands. 

You are being blatantly lied to everyday of your lives and those doing the lying is living off your tax dollars. You are paying them to lie to you.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, fedup said:

OK you ignorant liberal who is costing us all money with your stupid.   Her is a grade school lesson that you must have missed in all the great education you received studying man made global warming.

How much carbon dioxide does an acre of Michigan corn absorb in a growing season? That is a question that is often asked, and the answer may surprise many people. Our calculations show that number to be in excess of 36,000 lbs. of carbon dioxide per acre!Jun 7, 2007

 

Carbon is in carbon dioxide, which is a greenhouse gas that traps heat close to Earth. It helps Earth hold some of the heat it receives from the Sun so it doesn't all escape back into space. But CO2 is only good up to a point – beyond that point, Earth's temperature warms up too much. NASA research satellites such as OCO-2 and OCO-3 are studying how carbon moves around the planet.

All living things on Earth contain carbon. Even you contain carbon. Lots of it! Like every other living thing on this planet, we are a part of Earth's carbon cycle. Plants take in CO2. They keep the carbon and give away the oxygen. Animals breathe in the oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide. Carbon, including carbon dioxide, has cycled into and out of the air for a long time. This cycling of carbon has stayed balanced over long periods of time.

 

What is carbon dioxide?

Carbon dioxide is an important gas for life on the planet. (Remember our deep breath in and out?) It is crucial to maintaining the protective blanket that is Earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is often called "C-O-2" (pronounced see-oh-two) and written as "CO2" because "C" stands for carbon and "O" stands for oxygen. Carbon dioxide is one of the primary greenhouse gases on Earth.

 

Now don't forget people, this lying liberal will tell you that it is ok to pollute as long as you buy Carbon Points from him and his other rich friends.

This whole thing is a damn Liberal hoax designed to remove money from your hands and place that money in a certain few hands. 

You are being blatantly lied to everyday of your lives and those doing the lying is living off your tax dollars. You are paying them to lie to you.  

 

You are absolutely correct!  Biggest hoax of the century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the ragin' Liberal stupidity rages on

Be proud Liberals, be proud

 

The Biden administration released a sweeping plan to curb fossil fuel-fired power plant emissions Thursday, sparking concerns from experts about future U.S. power grid reliability.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plan — which would curb nationwide power sector emissions by about 617 million metric tons through 2042 — forces electric power providers to slash pollution by about 90% over the next two decades. To achieve such aggressive emissions reductions, power plants must adopt carbon capture, a nascent and costly technology, or shut down.

"Electricity in America is becoming increasingly intermittent, and it's because we are transitioning rapidly towards unreliable and untested wind and solar," Daniel Turner, the founder and executive director of Power The Future, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

"It's evident the Biden administration has no comprehensive energy plan," he continued. "They want everyone to have EVs, they want electric hot water heaters, they want electric stoves. But you cannot be pushing everyone towards electrification as the only source of power, while at the same time weakening the production of that power."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/14/2023 at 10:55 AM, S_A_Hoov said:

fed, Here in Cal any new home built has to have solar panels installed. Wonder who in the Cal. government owns stock in solar? 

 

And there it is.  Hell, I believe Florida is giving away panels using everyones tax dollars.   It's a shameless racket that is hurting many people's wallet. Remember ST Ronnie's famous words. "I am from the government and I am here to help". Our local power company runs commercials claiming solar is a sustainable energy. I guess no one told these fools that the sun goes down in Florida just like everywhere else. 

This political farce can be exposed just by using common sense and logic.  You don't need a fancy college degree. Just ask a few questions that they won't answer.

Just were and how do they come up with these numbers such as the earth will warm ,2 degrees in the next 20 years.

Name the so called experts, who is paying them, how much are they getting paid, and who is supplying their paycheck. 

Who is profiting from selling carbon points that allows certain people to pollute all they want. 

If the earth actually warms by .2 degrees in the next 20 years, SO WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL? 

How was the Great Lakes formed?

About 20,000 years ago, the climate warmed and the ice sheet retreated. Water from the melting glacier filled the basins , forming the Great Lakes. Approximately 3,000 years ago, the Great Lakes reached their present shapes and sizes.

Name the amount of coal mines. steel mills and SUV'S  they were on this earth 20,000 years ago.

What actually caused the glaciers to melt??????

Plus many more unanswered questions.  I bet you all can come up with a few of your own if you actually started questioning the voted for governments lies

Your government should be handing out free KY Jelly and preparation H to the tax payers instead of free solar panels, rebates and subsidies. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UH-OOOOOOO  someone showed the Liberals what was past their nose all along.

 

Europe is beginning to turn against the prophets of climate alarmism

Story by Fraser Nelson  Yesterday 3:00 PM
 

We’re now familiar with the lack of scrutiny or perspective when the subject is discussed. Some newspapers tell writers to avoid neutral phrases like “climate change” and instead say “emergency”, “crisis” or “breakdown”. Politicians have tended to compete with each other to see who can ring the alarm the loudest. Ed Miliband wanted to decarbonise electricity by 2030; Theresa May made Britain one of the few countries in the world with a legal target to hit net zero by 2050. But just how much would this cost? No one was really told.

Now, the bill is beginning to land – and reality beginning to bite. Dutch farmers recently drove tractors into The Hague to protest against its green diktats. In Germany, where the war in Ukraine has brought a new energy realpolitik, wind turbines are being dismantled to make way for an expanded coal mine. Sweden’s 27-year-old environment minister has been quietly diluting the green laws she inherited. Emmanuel Macron – famously chastened by the gilets jaunes – last week called on the EU to stop its barrage of green legislation, saying that enough is enough. We might just have passed Peak Green.

It’s all moving quite quickly. Last autumn, Germany signed an EU target to ban the sale of internal combustion engine cars by 2035. It now opposes the idea, as does Italy, Poland and Czechia. That’s not to say the green agenda is collapsing under the pressure of public scorn: it’s simply being subjected to the kind of scrutiny that was never applied in the first place. How much will it cost? What will it achieve? Germany’s transport minister has been making a good argument: what’s the point in electric cars if the power that drives them comes from burning coal?

 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Germany’s transport minister has been making a good argument: what’s the point in electric cars if the power that drives them comes from burning coal? And natural gas. 

Something the Green Clowns can't or better yet won't look at. They think that the energy to charge the battery's comes from the invisible charger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, S_A_Hoov said:

Germany’s transport minister has been making a good argument: what’s the point in electric cars if the power that drives them comes from burning coal? And natural gas. 

Something the Green Clowns can't or better yet won't look at. They think that the energy to charge the battery's comes from the invisible charger.

And there is much more they won't understand.

Once again, this whole farce is happening because they want your money today for a dream that can't ever produce but will get votes from the stupid voters that knows nothing about what they are voting for.

The liberal mouthpiece continues the lies to the lazy liberals who will not think for their selves.

The socialist who wants to control every aspect of your life comes hidden under the word liberalism. 

People willing to be uninformed are the stupid that promotes and protects the socialists that demands total capitulation.

 

HEIL HITLER 

Snap your right arm up into the sky you weak people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time to think   Use your head

 

How solar farms took over the California desert: ‘An oasis has become a dead sea’

Story by Oliver Wainwright in Desert Center, California  3h ago
 
Over the last few years, this swathe of desert has been steadily carpeted with one of the world’s largest concentrations of solar power plants, forming a sprawling photovoltaic sea. On the ground, the scale is almost incomprehensible. The Riverside East Solar Energy Zone – the ground zero of California’s solar energy boom – stretches for 150,000 acres, making it 10 times the size of Manhattan.
 
It is a crucial component of the United States’ green energy revolution. Solar makes up about 3% of the US electricity supply, but the Biden administration hopes it will reach 45% by 2050, primarily by building more huge plants like this across the country’s flat, empty plains.
 
The mostly flat expanse south-east of Joshua Tree national park was originally identified as a prime site for industrial-scale solar power under the Obama administration, which fast-tracked the first project, Desert Sunlight, in 2011. It was the largest solar plant in the world at the time of completion, in 2015, covering an area of almost 4,000 acres, and it opened the floodgates for more. Since then, 15 projects have been completed or are under construction, with momentous mythological names like Athos and Oberon. Ultimately, if built to full capacity, this shimmering patchwork quilt could generate 24 gigawatts annually, enough energy to power 7m homes.
 
Do the math, How much land in the US  How much land will these and windmills use by 2050??
Where will you build the homes they are suppose to supply?  I am just a dumbazz country boy and I can see it plain as day. 
 
They need to shut down every college these idiots graduated from.
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giant desert solar farms might have unintended climate consequences.

https://www.greenbiz.com/article/giant-desert-solar-farms-might-have-unintended-climate-consequences#:~:text=While the black surfaces of,to the environment as heat.

Got to say, man makes solar panels, so the climate change is man made. Get rid of solar, it's causing the earth to heat up. 

Got to love it. LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, S_A_Hoov said:

Giant desert solar farms might have unintended climate consequences.

https://www.greenbiz.com/article/giant-desert-solar-farms-might-have-unintended-climate-consequences#:~:text=While the black surfaces of,to the environment as heat.

Got to say, man makes solar panels, so the climate change is man made. Get rid of solar, it's causing the earth to heat up. 

Got to love it. LOL 

Amazing ain't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what happens when people start thinking for theirselves. 

Climate scientists flee Twitter as hostility surges

Story by AFP  Yesterday 8:29 PM
 

Scientists suffering insults and mass-spam are abandoning Twitter for alternative social networks as hostile climate-change denialism surges on the platform following Elon Musk's takeover.

Researchers have documented an explosion of hate and misinformation on Twitter since the Tesla billionaire took over in October 2022 -- and now experts say communicating about climate science on the social network on which many of them rely is getting harder.

 

The government paid professional liars can't take the truth so they run and hide with people who perpetuate their lies. 

Researchers have documented an explosion of hate and misinformation

 replies from verified accounts making misleading or misguided claims."

SO these are the crybabies claims,  poor babies. If it hurts so bad you would think they would offer up some proof of their claims amongst all those words they say. 

misinformation misleading misguided claims.

Read the whole article, not once did these professionals offer up EVEN ONE example of what they are claiming. 

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Britain fires up coal plant as solar panels suffer in hot weather

Story by Melissa Lawford, Chris Price, Benedict Smith  Yesterday 6:01 PM
 

Britain has started burning coal to generate electricity for the first time in a month and a half, after the heatwave made solar panels too hot to work efficiently.

One unit at Uniper’s Ratcliffe-on-Soar coal power plant in Nottinghamshire started producing electricity for the first time in weeks on Monday morning, while another coal-powered plant was warmed up in case it was needed by the early afternoon.

 

solar panels too hot to work efficiently.

 

HA HA HA HA HA HA  GIGGLE GIGGLE TE-HE

and these are the brain dead fools running your life. Give that a long thought as you struggle to pay your bills. 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watchdog hits John Kerry with science ethics complaint over climate change deaths claim

'Such a blatant misstatement of scientific information to the public is, by its nature, a threat to public trust and good governance,' the complaint states

 

 

EXCLUSIVE: A government watchdog group filed an ethics complaint against Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry on Tuesday morning, alleging he spread misinformation about climate change.

In its complaint, Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT) alleged that Kerry violated federal scientific integrity policy — which requires officials to communicate scientific information accurately based on the best available evidence — when he said in May that greenhouse gas emissions kill 15 million people per year worldwide. PPT requested a federal investigation into Kerry's comments.

"15 million people are dying every single year around this planet as a consequence of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere, in the air which travels around and drops in the form of pollution and is warming the ocean at record rates, changing the chemistry of the ocean itself," Kerry remarked on May 10 at the Department of Agriculture's AIM for Climate Summit. 

 

"Despite the enormity of Mr. Kerry’s claim, he did not cite any scientific evidence for its basis," the PPT complaint stated. "Nor is there any apparent scientific research that supports a claim that there are currently 15 million people dying yearly due to greenhouse gas emissions — or any other single cause of death that is tracked."

"Such a blatant misstatement of scientific information to the public is, by its nature, a threat to public trust and good governance," it continued. "It is made far worse when such misinformation is used to publicly support sweeping policy changes like trying to reach net-zero emissions in agriculture, which would have untold effects upon the economy and lives of the American people writ large."

JOHN KERRY'S OFFICE CONSULTED LEFT-WING ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS WHILE CRAFTING POLICIES, EMAILS SHOW

The complaint further stated that conduct like Kerry's "inevitably erodes the public’s trust in its scientific and governing institutions" and harms the nation "by reducing science from a great, dispassionate tool of public policy that transcends party lines to yet another political football."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watchdog-hits-john-kerry-science-ethics-complaint-climate-change-deaths-claim

 

This lying liberal has been doing this since the first time he opened his lying liberal mouth. 

Someone needs to stick their carbon based fist down his lying liberal throat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was anyone listening to Greta Thunberg in the first place?

Opinion by Zachary Faria  Yesterday 12:42 PM
 

It’s all over for us. The climate change crisis is no longer reversible, and all of humanity is doomed.

At least, that is all according to Greta Thunberg and a “top climate scientist” who said that “climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.” That was tweeted on this day five years ago, meaning today is the final day we have to stop using fossil fuels entirely. But all of this raises a question: Why was some random child propped up as the arbiter of climate change policy in the first place?

Thunberg deleted her doomsaying tweet, presumably so she can reset the doomsday clock and continue her climate grift. That activist grift started when she was 15 with her skipping school and protesting in front of Sweden’s Parliament. From there, her activist cause was picked up by every establishment media outlet around, including ABC News, CBS, CNN, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, among others.

 

It didn’t just stop there. Thunberg was invited to the United Nations to lecture world leaders about how she knew so much more about the climate than they did and how “you are failing us” young people and “we will never forgive you.” Her climate tantrums earned her Time's 2019 Person of the Year.

But why? Thunberg didn’t, and still doesn’t, know anything about how oil, natural gas, and coal have sustained humanity and are both more efficient and more reliable than renewable energy sources. She also hates nuclear energy, which produces no carbon emissions and is far more efficient and reliable than wind and solar. We have already seen California follow anti-nuclear “green” policies, which led to the state firing up natural gas generators to try and keep the lights on.

 

 

Thunberg is nothing more than a whiny child turned whiny adult, and yet she was propped up as the face of liberal climate change policy. Liberal media outlets and liberal elites around the world anointed her as the world’s savior at the age of 16, and those same institutions demand that you take their warnings about climate change seriously.

Both they and Thunberg will not simply move the goal posts again. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) set the new doomsday date in 2031, so perhaps they will all coalesce around that prediction. But this should be the end of the line for their credibility. No one who promoted a random child as a climate change expert should be taken seriously on climate change or energy policy again, no matter how frantic and hysterical their doomsday predictions become.

 

Ain't it something when Liberals produce kids as some sort of expert? They use the kid to pass their lies because no one wants to attack a kid especially this one who is mentally challenged. 

Real classy adults

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siemens Energy shares plunge more than 30% as wind turbine worries deepen

Story by Elliot Smith  5h ago
 
  • The company announced late on Thursday that a review of issues at subsidiary Siemens Gamesa had found a "substantial increase in failure rates of wind turbine components."
  • The Siemens Gamesa board has initiated an "extended technical review" that will incur "significantly higher costs" than previously assumed, estimated to be in excess of 1 billion euros ($1.09 billion).
  • Siemens Energy shares plunged 33% on Friday morning after the company scrapped its profit forecast and warned that costly problems at its wind turbine unit could last for years.
  • The company, born from the spinoff of the former gas and power division of German conglomerate Siemens, announced late on Thursday that a review of issues at subsidiary Siemens Gamesa had found a "substantial increase in failure rates of wind turbine components."

 

Their promotional lies are catching up to them faster than climate change. 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If July 3 was hot wherever you are, you're not alone: It was the world's hottest day on record. The average global temperature hit 17.01 degrees Celsius (62.62 Fahrenheit), passing the previous record, set in August 2016, of 16.92C (62.46F), Reuters reports. Of course, that's an average, and some places were more unbearable than others: China, India, the UK, the southern United States, and northern Mexico have experienced heat waves recently, Bloomberg reports. In North Africa, temperatures have reached as high as 122F. Meanwhile, in Antarctica, it's winter, but even there temperatures have been unusually high.

And the propaganda lies keeps on coming from the lying liberals. 

In another week you will no longer be able to make ice anywhere on this planet. 

Just who is stupid enough to believe this bullsh1t?????? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, fedup said:

Meanwhile, in Antarctica, it's winter, but even there temperatures have been unusually high.

 

How high??????    can't you dream up another lie?????

John "Herman Munster" Kerry sez....."Why it's so hot in Antarctica now the penguins are sun bathing while all the ice is melting....it's climate change, I tell ya!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

©iStockphoto.com/ablokhin

Our Weather City Pages give you today's and tomorrow's weather, an hour-by-hour forecast, a 14-day forecast, searchable past weather, and climate information for a location.

Go to the weather pages for your city

Are 14-Day Forecasts Accurate?

Modern weather predictions are a combination of computer-based models and human experience. As a rule of thumb, the closer a weather forecast is in time, the more accurate it is. Long-term predictions have a larger margin of error because there are more unknown variables.

This means that our short- and medium-range forecasts are the most accurate. Long-range forecasts predicting the weather for more than 7 days in advance should be seen as a rough guide, as the accuracy of weather predictions falls considerably around the one-week mark.

If you notice a weather forecast that is repeatedly incorrect, please let us know.

Weather Station Limitations

Past, current, or predicted temperature values displayed in a weather report may not always represent the warmest or coldest temperature for a location on a particular day.

This is due to practical limitations:

  • Time: If the temperature is recorded at 13:00 (1:00 pm) and again at 14:00 (2:00 pm) but the temperature peaks at 13:30 (1:30 pm), the readings for the maximum temperature will be a little too low.
  • Frequency: Some weather stations do not report as frequently as others. Some stations transmit their readings every 30 minutes or every hour while others may do so every 2 or 3 hours. Also, some stations are not consistent with the times in which they provide their reports.
  • Location: In some cases, weather stations are quite far away from the city, so weather conditions may differ there.

Where Does the Weather Data Come From?

CustomWeather provides the weather data on timeanddate.com. They use weather stations at airports, stations run by the World Meteorological Association (WMO), and MADIS weather stations which are typically a community effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To meet the European Union’s carbon reduction goals, the government of Ireland has proposed culling (a polite way of saying killing) 200,000 cows, effectively reducing the nation’s dairy herd by 10%.  A move that even drew the ridicule of Elon Musk.

Not to be outdone, New York City has proposed new regulations for wood- and coal-fired pizza ovens operated within the city’s five boroughs. The city has proposed that all wood- and coal-fired pizza ovens installed before 2016 be fitted with emission control devices, impacting approximately 100 restaurants, at a cost of $20,000-30,000 per eatery.

 

The grand prize for insanity, however, goes to the Biden administration. Stealing a storyline from "The Simpsons," a document published on the White House website reveals the "Biden administration is open to studying how to block sunlight to save the Earth from climate change.  The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has been researching ‘geoengineering’ methods to keep the sun’s rays from accelerating global warming."

Have we reached the limits of this green insanity? It's doubtful. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Numerous corporate media outlets drove the narrative that July 3-5 was the hottest 72-hour stretch ever on record, citing a computer model from the University of Maine which the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has warned is not as dependable as traditional observational data.

The New York Times, Fortune, Axios and CBS News each cited the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer computer model in various Thursday reports asserting that this week’s global temperatures broke the previous record for hottest three-day stretch. The coverage came as NOAA said Thursday that the model’s findings are not a suitable substitute for observational data, since the model depends in part on unverifiable, computer-generated outputs, according to The Associated Press.

Axios’ Thursday headline asserted that “Earth sees three hottest days on record,” while The Times wrote in its Thursday story that “the past three days were quite likely the hottest in Earth’s modern history.” CBS News ran a chyron on a Thursday television segment which read, “Earth sees third straight hottest day on record,” while the first half of Fortune’s Thursday headline stated that “Earth hits record heat third day in a row.”

“Although NOAA cannot validate the methodology or conclusion of the University of Maine analysis, we recognize that we are in a warm period due to climate change,” NOAA said, according to the AP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...